You clearly missed my point. Asking about which Scotch is better is non bragging or defending drinking. Even a heavy drinker knows there are harmful effects to drinking. But the stoner will admit to no detrimental effects, evidence to the contrary not withstanding.
Asking about which is the best $200 scotch to buy, is touting scotch.
Even a heavy drinker knows there are harmful effects to drinking.
You've never seen an alcoholic in denial?
Such as...? Do tell——this ought to be good.
LMAO!
No. Anything to excess is a bad thing. All us grownups understand that.
I and Gargantua did not get to where we are now by being high on drugs constantly for our entire lives, just like you did not get to your place by being constantly drunk for the last 20 years.
Of course pot has possible negative effects, just like every single other thing you can possibly put in your body, such as water. No one disputes that. Is this really the crux of your argument? If so, your sauce is weak sauce.