Posted on 02/11/2015 6:45:22 AM PST by C19fan
It may have been touted as the steamiest thing in Hollywood - but movie critics rounded on Fifty Shades of Grey for being too light on the sex. In a barrage of reviews published on Tuesday night, most of those who sat down with the raunchy adaptation ahead of its 13 February release date lamented its 'run-of-the-mill' lovemaking. One critic pointed out that sex only makes up 15 minutes of the two-hour runtime. Another pointed out that there are no visible genitals, no orgasms - and not that much nudity.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
Ah yes!
Exactly what Old Ben does not have.
Didn’t Chris Hensworth pass on it also?
...which had its creepy moments but a few good ones too.
Yeah, you sound like your like my wife, after every episode of 7 seasons of Sons of Anarchy I’d have to wipe the drool off her chin ‘cause of that guy. lol
I can guarantee this flick will be nothing like that crazy lars von trier movie called Nymphomaniac parts I and II
Charlotte Gainsborough and Stellan Skaarsgard
Freepers who think this flick mild bondage flick is Sodom and Gomorrah should for sure avoid that one
I’ve never seen anything like it...it was bizarre
porn more or less to be honest...and very violent
disturbing which is i guess the point
you wonder if Birken and Serge figured their little darling would make so many crazy movies
I liked that movie too
it was for sure kinky but poignant with a happy ending
you do know around here liking erotic flicks can get you some serious scorn
Yeah I like James Spader but that was a weird flick. If you want to see another strange one with James Spader check this one:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0115964/
Yeah, heard about that one. I wonder if it’s on Netflix?
Oh, yeah. God forbid anyone find out that I have it on first "hand" authority that there is at least one woman in the world who likes to re-enact a certain scene from Secretary. But you didn't hear that from me. :-)
Nah no drool. I think he’s cute....for a blonde.
So ... go down to Sleazy Pete's (or the interwebz thingy) and get a porno.
Idiots.
Some weirdos pay good money for “Mistress Lyndie” to treat them like that ...
Now your gonna have to tell us what scene! olo
Yeah, they’re always looking for a big thick stiff wallet.
A coworker once heard such a statement and responded, "There's something ELSE on the Internet?!?"
“No, No, No! Not lay down.....I said SIT!
And, the inimitable:
...and, since I'm feeling a bit sadistic myself, I'll remind everyone that these were sung 48 years ago. Yep, two years short of half a century. If you remember them, you're too old. ;-)
Yet the book is full of that, and it is largely women complaining about things not in the movie.
As with the book, this is aimed at a female audience. If there were no women that want that, this poorly written drivel would not have sold millions and there never would have been a movie.
The last porn aimed at women which previously grew popular enough for me to hear of it was Anne Rice’s “Sleeping Beauty” trilogy. That was even more violent than this (if better written).
It never was the case that women eschew porn. Most porn aimed at the female market is three dimensional and tends to be battery operated.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.