Posted on 02/08/2015 10:30:31 AM PST by SamAdams76
I wonder how a conspiracy theory is going to be spun out of this. But I guarantee there will be conspiracy theories!
I’ve got one. This nut decided to become a celebrity via a very deviant mental disorder and killed somebody.
That would be you.
That explains why the window was down, but not why he was following so close and couldn’t stop. I guess we’ll know for sure once the phone records come back. As I said before, if the paparazzi made her stop short they will be on the hook. But he furthered the chain reaction so him hitting the Lexus is still his fault.
And when a Lexus sedan hits a Hummer like that head on, forget about it, the Lexus stands zero chance
Anyone can read back...You’re embarrassing yourself and making yourself even a bigger fool.
But feel free to continue.
welcome, it’s so hard when a thread is long to read the entire thread then go back and post. I know other Freeps answered or posted the info earlier. I just didn’t know because I am slowing getting to the end.
After 14 years, I still don’t post right. Sigh, I will never make the Royal Order of the Freeperhood. But not all of us will. That is for the few, the brave and for those that don’t pimp blogs. (lol)
Anybody tagged with hitting the back of a car is automatically charged with following to close and careless driving.
This jackass of a human knocked them into oncoming traffic.
Go to God Bruce Jenner, your time here is done.
I don’t smoke, never have, BUT for anyone that has, if your are RIGHT or LEFT handed, do you hold the cigarette in that hand?
The paparazzi weren’t a factor. There were 5 of them following him at normal speed.
Both Bruce and the police said theybwere not at fault.
Hmm? I always expected it was Jenner who would die from being rear ended.
They show the long skid marks of the trailer on the VIDEO here
Looks to me like an H2 — built on a Suburban-like chassis. Not the military version.
As far as establishing blame, it doesn’t make a bit of difference whether (s)he was holding a cigarette or a cell phone.
He rear ended another car because he was inattentive or following too close as the other car slowed due to the fact that they were approaching an intersection.
The standard excuse in such a situation is that the car in front braked suddenly. That excuse almost never works. Nor does claiming that paparazzi are chasing you.
In any event, the cops will have readouts from both cars’ computers, they have the photos, and there are witnesses.
Yes.
I’m not claiming his car didn’t skid, I’m just saying my truck doesn’t.
Seems like there should be trailer skid marks though.
Looks like a pretty cheap trailer, probably no brakes
If the Prius that she had hit (rear ended) was still close to her bump rear ending of that Prius and then Bruce either pulled to the side to try to avoid hitting her, or was drifting, but my question is, if the Prius was sill close from the first “crash” when Bruce hit the Lexus would the Prius being so close by (from the first rear end) possible have slowed the Lexus’s or prevented it from being pushed hard in to oncoming traffic and the Hummer? The Prius if close (from first accident) would have absorbed some of the impact of the second collision (Bruce)?
Actually, I have a caveat to that statement. If you are in a car, you hold the cigarette in whichever hand is closest to the window. That’s the one major exception.
Keep reading the thread...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.