Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Red Badger

Fifty years ago, how many teenage Beatles fans knew about music from 1915. That would be the equivalent.


2 posted on 01/05/2015 12:46:10 PM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: discostu

Hehe


5 posted on 01/05/2015 12:48:30 PM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Borges

No it wouldn’t.

There is more continuity and public appearances and elevator music and media appearances and mention on music shows about the Beatles and Yoko Ono and Paul McCartney, than the example of a 1915 musician in 1974, when Paul, Wings, and the Beatles were super stars, not to mention how big 1960s music still has importance in current America.


9 posted on 01/05/2015 12:53:00 PM PST by ansel12 (They hate us, because they ain't us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Borges; wideawake

The most popular recording entity of the acoustic era (pre mid 1920s) was the Peerless Quartet. How many teens of the 60s (or even 50s) knew who they were?


11 posted on 01/05/2015 12:54:13 PM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Borges
Fifty years ago, how many teenage Beatles fans knew about music from 1915. That would be the equivalent.

Now THAT makes me feel old.

14 posted on 01/05/2015 12:56:12 PM PST by American Quilter (The urge to save humanity is nearly always a cover for the urge to rule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Borges

50 years ago a lot of the chart topping songs were covers of much older songs written by old black men.

Top of the billboard charts the day I was born and written by Leadbelly many years before that.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MgTSfJEf_jM


20 posted on 01/05/2015 1:01:15 PM PST by cripplecreek (You can't half ass conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Borges

“That would be the equivalent.”

I don’t think it is equivalent, because there was no one group in 1915 that was ever as big as the Beatles. Also, the Beatles continue to be fairly prominent culturally to this day, with their music still being used in movie soundtracks, commercials, etc.


37 posted on 01/05/2015 1:11:45 PM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Borges; a fool in paradise; al baby

They might have heard of the Light Crust Doughboys though, I mean they are still big enough to have their own website.

http://lightcrustdoughboys.org/

I heard that light crust dough protects you from BRD, your own not that of others.


39 posted on 01/05/2015 1:12:45 PM PST by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Borges

how many teenage Beatles fans knew about music from 1915


When I was a hotshot know-it-all, in the early ‘80s, a salesman cold called me, on the phone. I was busy, but he sold a competing product, to one that we bought.

I told him to give me his name and number. I said, “What’s that, Pete Atkinson?” “No, Atchison, like ‘Atchison, Topeka and the Santa Fe’”, he replied. My response was along the lines of “Huh?”. The guy let out a sad sigh, and spelled A-T-C-H-I-S-O-N.

After we hung up, I came to realize he was referencing a song from yesteryear, that my Dad would sometimes sing. I felt bad, knowing that as a salesman, he had probably used that catchy line, to great affect, for many years, but was coming to the realization that sunset was soon approaching, on his career.

Now that I’m closing in on age 60, I can really empathize with Pete.


40 posted on 01/05/2015 1:13:29 PM PST by jttpwalsh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Borges
"Fifty years ago, how many teenage Beatles fans knew about music from 1915. That would be the equivalent."

No it isn't. Because of dramatic changes in technology and the pervasiveness of media, few - if any - active performers in 1915 would still have recordings of their performances - in any media - still widely available in 1965. On the other hand, McCartney is still touring, he performed at the Super Bowl a couple of years ago, and the music of The Beatles is still widely played on oldies radio stations. A better analogy would be comparing the sixties era to the Big Band era, and most of us sixties-era people had heard of Benny Goodman, Artie Shaw, and Glen Miller, the equivalents of Paul McCartney.
61 posted on 01/05/2015 1:47:49 PM PST by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Borges
The Beatles had the top selling album of the first decade of the 21st Century.

Linky.

65 posted on 01/05/2015 1:54:24 PM PST by kristinn (Welcome to the Soviet States of Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Borges
Fifty years ago, how many teenage Beatles fans knew about music from 1915. That would be the equivalent.

Hardly the equivalent. In 1915, there was no TV, no music on radio, no talking movies, and no equivalent pop cultural explosion.

Virtually EVERYBODY in the Western World -- including my 80-year-old Russian born Jewish immigrant grandmother who never learned to read English -- knew who the Beatles were by the end of 1964, which made them TRUE superstars -- as opposed to today, when the world is full of "superstars" that an awful lot of people -- especially people in their 60s and 70s -- never heard of.

I can tell you though, having been a new teenager when the Beatles first hit the American airwaves, I sure knew who Rudy Vallee was, and recognized the parody when the New Vaudeville Band released "Winchester Cathedral" with the singer sounding like he was singing through a megaphone.

66 posted on 01/05/2015 1:54:40 PM PST by Maceman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Borges
And as this writer points out:

...the best-selling album of the decade is the Beatles' 1, a collection of their number one hits. And that, when counting the individual albums in their massive (and very expensive) box sets of remastered recordings released just this past September as individual albums rather than one "unit," the erstwhile lads from Liverpool have sold more CDs than Eminem, the leading solo act of the decade, or any group, for that matter.

67 posted on 01/05/2015 1:58:10 PM PST by kristinn (Welcome to the Soviet States of Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Borges
Billboard, August 2014:

Hot Tours: Paul McCartney Is No. 1 With Sold Out U.S. Tour

69 posted on 01/05/2015 2:01:15 PM PST by kristinn (Welcome to the Soviet States of Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Borges
Fifty years ago, how many teenage Beatles fans knew about music from 1915. That would be the equivalent.

OTOH, a goodly portion of Beatles fans knew the music of Scott Joplin, thanks to the movie, The Sting.

85 posted on 01/05/2015 2:32:08 PM PST by Sirius Lee (All that is required for evil to advance is for government to do "something")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Borges

I was in my teens during the late seventies and early eighties. I knew something about Big Band, which was the music of my parents’ generation.

These kids are idiots.


107 posted on 01/05/2015 3:30:02 PM PST by CatherineofAragon ((Support Christian white males---the architects of the jewel known as Western Civilization.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson