Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Gaffer

Reproductive justice requires that men who will never personally require maternity care or other gynecological services must still fund them through their insurance plans because (and it is stated as such), ‘he’ MAY get someone pregnant someday.

It’s actually about redistributing wealth (beyond cost-sharing) and as Obamacare has been ruled a tax, taxing/billing for services that are never rendered.


31 posted on 01/04/2015 5:17:30 AM PST by a fool in paradise (Shickl-Gruber's Big Lie gave us Hussein's Un-Affordable Care act (HUAC).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: a fool in paradise

Yes....it is really ALL about the money, isn’t it?


32 posted on 01/04/2015 5:24:05 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: a fool in paradise; Gaffer; GeronL

“Reproductive justice requires that men who will never personally require maternity care or other gynecological services must still fund them through their insurance plans because (and it is stated as such), ‘he’ MAY get someone pregnant someday.”

In all fairness he may have a wife/girlfriend who might get pregnant.

If one watches the Maury Show then you know he may have a wife and several girls friends at any given time that may be her baby’s daddy.

One dude in Tennessee has fathered 27? babies by 14 women. So yea I see why they want men to pay for this.


33 posted on 01/04/2015 6:54:08 PM PST by Morgana ( Always a bit of truth in dark humor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson