To: LibWhacker
“They found that ‘wave-particle duality’ is simply the quantum ‘uncertainty principle’ in disguise”
That was my understanding from college, decades ago. I suppose they formalized the connection.
To: rightwingcrazy
Why do I think you were voted in high school "Most likely to clear out a party"???
Just kidding, I will send this to my son who loves physics and was voted "most likely"...
3 posted on
12/19/2014 11:40:44 AM PST by
fatez
(Ebola, Obama's solution for shovel ready jobs... Bring out your dead!!!)
To: rightwingcrazy
Joe Biden knew all that years ago!
5 posted on
12/19/2014 11:41:59 AM PST by
2nd Amendment
(Proud member of the 48% . . giver not a taker)
To: rightwingcrazy
They found that wave-particle duality is simply the quantum uncertainty principle in disguise
That was my understanding from college, decades ago. I suppose they formalized the connection. It was either that, or something else, or both at the same time.
11 posted on
12/19/2014 11:46:03 AM PST by
kosciusko51
(Enough of "Who is John Galt?" Who is Patrick Henry?)
To: rightwingcrazy
I always thought they were!
15 posted on
12/19/2014 11:52:37 AM PST by
Cyman
(We have to pass it to see what's in it= definition of stool sample)
To: rightwingcrazy
“That was my understanding from college, decades ago. I suppose they formalized the connection.”
Yes:
It’s possible to write equations that capture how much can be learned about pairs of properties that are affected by the uncertainty principle. Coles, Kaniewski and Wehner are experts in a form of such equations known as ‘entropic uncertainty relations’, and they discovered that all the maths previously used to describe wave-particle duality could be reformulated in terms of these relations.
To: rightwingcrazy
Why don’t they just answer both questions rather than dink around with the semantics?
38 posted on
12/19/2014 12:14:18 PM PST by
Paladin2
To: rightwingcrazy
Could this be why, in a previous article, we could not tell a girl from a boy? The uncertainty principle! That is my story and science will let me stick to it. Yea....
55 posted on
12/19/2014 2:55:42 PM PST by
cotton
(one way, one truth, the life.)
To: rightwingcrazy
Yes, this reads like physics history. I recommend INTRODUCING QUANTUM THEORY, one of a series of INTRODUCING ... books ( there's a lot of them! ) and I think they're all pretty good, but I have a real affection for IQT. All these are in a sort of comic book format, sort of a coloring book, with black printing on stiff paper. But it is by no means "dumbed down" ... far from it! Terse, but not sketchy, it follows the year by year developments and the thinking of the personalities. I gained a lot of perspective and new insight from this book. It is worth study!
Anyway, the thinking of Our Heroes on the issue of wave/particle duality and uncertainty is given close scrutiny.
Can you name the "Big 9" on the cover ?

71 posted on
12/19/2014 8:21:52 PM PST by
dr_lew
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson