Actually, if you read the article she definitely has read the book.
What she’s saying is that Fitch had the gall to disbelieve and then challenge the rape story. Which per current standards (rape “victims” must always be believed, without question) makes him a rape apologist.
It’s a real keeper of an article, she makes her point very, very well.
Is she a lawyer?
A lawyer is supposed to protect his/her client from injustice. That’s their job.................