Hopefully we'll address this problem in a few days ....
Education Revolution:
We are up against a clock — educational indoctrination.
Soon, we can discuss ‘computerized school choice’ — over 50 education options for each household that includes religious viewpoints that parents can choose from. Rather than a ‘cookie-cutter’ classroom, each student could have a custom curriculum, including tests that are random, multiple choice, and immune to a subjective teacher.
Next, Social Security Benefits reform.
Next, a Town Hall Tribunal [formerly referred to as ‘the Committee’]
Then, a focus on mandatory fair debates. A theocracy suppresses free speech. This is the polar-opposite of a theocracy ... only the power to persuade via mandatory fair debate.
Then, a focus on tainting court opinions and judges.
. . . .
Early Next Year ...
There's more to be covered reg. the ‘Under God’ amendment. Here are some examples:
1. Ways to purge our courts of our worst judicial tyrants. Judges will continue to favor their cherished tyrannical precedents [such as ‘separation of church and state’] until we yank away some gavels and tell them, “Don't let the door hit you on the way out.”
2. Pledge of Allegiance reform — ‘under God’ optional according to parental instructions. Otherwise mandatory according to state legislation. [Other things about this might interest you as well.]
3. As part of the Mandatory Fair Debate Plan, we'll cover some ideas that apply to the ‘Under God Amendment’ as well.
4. Clarifying the ‘Establishment Clause’ that demolishes the ‘wall of separation between church and state’. And since Sharia Law is an established religion, it should be banned.
5. Options for the federal government to counter Islamo-terror specifically as well as zoning authority to counter Islamic Victory Mosques.
6. Theoretical religious persecution by employers... [This would be a secularist weapon if we don't remove the firing pin.]
7. Unified penitent prayer on Good Friday [voluntary prayer of course]
The ‘Under God Amendment’ can't possibly be restricted to ‘single subject’. Congressional rules would require a targeted suspension. But it's worth it. It would be like stepping back to the 1950s only better, and without the racism.