[Talisker]

But the judge also rejected Apple's argument that the case should be dismissed because it's too late to name a new plaintiff. She ordered the attorneys suing Apple to identify a new person, by Tuesday, who can serve as a lead plaintiff.

Well now at least the appeal is nailed.

[Swordmaker]

Well now at least the appeal is nailed.

The plaintiffs LIED to bring this case to court. . . if they did not have an iPod capable of the so-called activity they are claiming at trial, and swore in depositions in discovery that THEY were somehow economically injured by, but we're now proved not to have and never owned to be injured, who else provided the evidence that got this ball rolling? It is supposed to be the injured party, not someone the lawyers ring in. Are they going to be allowed a pinch-plaintiff? Does truth no longer matter?