Posted on 11/30/2014 2:57:41 PM PST by icwhatudo
A new arguement and outrage is emerging in Fergusen. While the white officer who shot Mike Brown goes free, another officer, a black man by the name of Dawon Gore, is currently in trouble for simply striking a white man with a batton. The problem is...his victim was black.
Internet meme's with the huge factual error like the one above are tweeted and retweeted or radicals will simply post inncorrect things like this on Twitter :
When you point out their error, many will ask for proof. For that we go to Officer Dawon Gore's own words:
“Officer Darren Wilson is White, I am a Black Officer. Wilson didn’t do a report, I also chose not to do a report. Both subjects were black males, Wilson’s subject had cigars but was unarmed and my subject was found not to be armed as well. Wilson drew a weapon (gun), and I drew my metal baton.”
One must ask the question... If these #ferguson radicals (or just common sappy liberals) can be so wrong on such a major part of a story....what else have they been wrong about? What other falsehoods (hands up/shot in back/etc) are they blindly retweeting?
Facts don’t matter when it comes to inciting a race war. This is the one area where the left actually cares about results. BTW, wasn’t Manson’s goal a race war? But I digress. It is all about the mission to divide and create hate; this is what the left wants. Facts? Truth? To the left truth is: “If you tell a lie loudly enough, often enough and with enough conviction it becomes truth”. “Truth” to them is anything they can use to advance their agenda.
Black cops? They can swing away.
The entire chaos from the White House on down aused by the 18 year old black youth thug’s death is based on fact free “information.”
You all saw him, but do you know he is and what he does? Here he is with his hand on Dorian's shoulder.
Here he is at the protest, GETTING IN THEIR FACE (like Obama said).
Here's his wrecking crew.
Here he is with Sharpton and Mike Brown's father.
The thing that bothers me is the passive police response.
Fact is this will make all police forces all black eventually then when it comes your way what side do you think a passive black police force be when the black hordes come down your street.
|
Black on black, no matter what the situation, doesn’t allow radical Democrats to promote racial justice. For that they need racism. A black cop shoots and kills an unarmed white kid, and nothing happens, no commotion, no riots, nothing, because in the minds of radical Democrats, it isn’t racism, and there is nothing there to push racial justice. Obama’s election was all about racial justice, not to be confused with truth or real justice. Real justice is what happened when Wilson killed Brown in self defense. Radical Democrats need black militance, and they will use whatever they have to pour gasoline on their race fire.
They want America to become another South Africa, and radical Democrats will do whatever they can to manufacture that. Notice there are two groups of people in America now, white people, and people of color. Those are the sides being created by radical Democrats, and that is the civil war they want to cause.
There’s a psychology at work that isn’t spoken about often, and that is that many black males simply have a difficult time coping with a fact set that includes a black male losing a public confrontation with a white male. This is true for poor, middle class, and wealthy blacks.
The ugly truth is that the black community has a long way to go to get to where they need to be. I honestly don’t see it happening for a long, long time.
Just one man’s opinion.
“Fact is this will make all police forces all black eventually”
Not gonna happen.
It seems to me that someone somewhere is trying as hard as they can to “lightning rod a revolution” which, incidentally, is the subject of The Hunger Games Mockinjay.
Circumstances in the movie are perhaps a bit different, but the technique is the same.
In the movie certain characters whose motivations are somewhat nebulous use the main character, the girl, to spark a revolution against an evil president, and they do it using less than truthful films referred to as “propos”.
They have to create scenarios and circumstances to get her to say the right things in the right way so that they can then broadcast these films in such a way that it spurs people to revolution.
I think that is exactly what is occurring in America right now, and I ask myself who wants revolution and why?
It’s clearly the powers that be, i.e. Obama, his AG and his media who wants this, and they have wanted it for sometimes as they continually pick at this scab.
And when they have no lightning rod, no prism through which to foucs anger, they manufacture one out of wholecloth and proceed on blatant lies as they try to whip the horde of those who believe anything that they are told by their masters into frenzy.
So why do they want it? What is their end game? Because they are clearly going to continue to do this crap unitl they get the result they desire, and if that result remains elusive, then they will manufacture it themselves.
Thanks icwhatudo.
yes ok, all major city trash, water gas depts. not counting downtown are majority what, look around? We must represent the neighborhood.
So glad I moved to rural Texas.
If a lie serves the left’s agenda, it’s true enough to be repeated.
based on fact free “information.”
So is all of liberalism.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
