Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/30/2014 12:30:58 PM PST by Steelfish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
To: Steelfish

England...almost gone in one generation


2 posted on 11/30/2014 12:34:02 PM PST by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

Repent for the End is Near!
Freegards
LEX


3 posted on 11/30/2014 12:35:01 PM PST by lexington minuteman 1775
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

As the UK as we once knew itbslowly slips away......
How long till Moehamhead is number one here too?


4 posted on 11/30/2014 12:40:50 PM PST by Sasparilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

what s Shame!


5 posted on 11/30/2014 12:41:45 PM PST by MeshugeMikey ("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

Time for the Brits to go King Herod on the muzzy babies.


6 posted on 11/30/2014 12:47:12 PM PST by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

A culture’s essence is its philosophical principles. The identification of its philosophical principles is achieved by observing its cultural products.The popularity of the name mohammed is a cultural product that predicts doom for England as a rational culture.


7 posted on 11/30/2014 12:48:25 PM PST by mjp ((pro-{God, reality, reason, egoism, individualism, natural rights, limited government, capitalism}))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

9 posted on 11/30/2014 12:52:16 PM PST by onyx (Please Support Free Republic - Donate Monthly! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, Let Me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

A once truly great nation.


10 posted on 11/30/2014 12:53:07 PM PST by all the best
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

It helps if half if Moslem males are named Mohammad. It just shows lack of imagination and diversity when it comes to Islam.


11 posted on 11/30/2014 12:53:44 PM PST by sagar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

I hope that many of these boys grow up to convert to Orthodox Christianity.

Then they will need FAST name changes, to names like Nicholas, Andrew, Stephen, John, Michael, Alexander, etc., etc.

Such names are INFINITELY better than Muhammad!!!!


13 posted on 11/30/2014 1:05:04 PM PST by Honorary Serb (Kosovo is Serbia! Free Srpska! Abolish ICTY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

Do they have something against Ahmed, Abdul or Osama?


16 posted on 11/30/2014 1:24:45 PM PST by alstewartfan (For more than all the ghosts of glory SHE makes up the story of my life. Harry Chapin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish
England, we hardly knew ya... first country to commit suicide in my lifetime
17 posted on 11/30/2014 1:26:11 PM PST by Chode (Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -w- NO Pity for the LAZY - 86-44)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

No. It isn’t.

They play this game every time the figures come out and every time they lie in the same way.

You get this result only if you count every variant spelling/version of Mohammed as one name - and you don’t do the same for every variant of far more common English names - count all the variants of Henry as one. Count all the variants of Edward as one. Count all the variants of John as one. Count all the variants of Charles as one.

I’ve done the analysis in the past on previous years figures and posted them here. I don’t have time to do it again this year right now.

But this is misleading, deliberate, propaganda that doesn’t treat names identically.

To explain what I mean I will repost here one of my past analysis - this one from 2010 based on its figures (it was the quickest one I could find). Like I say, I don’t have time to do it for this years figures right now, but it illustrates the problem:

“OK, let’s look at what they did here.

To make their claim, they combined the numbers for every variant spelling of the name Mohammed they could find - and then compared it to single spellings of other names. They didn’t consider the possibility those other names might have variant spellings as well.

I have - I’ve got the data.

If you total together all the variant spelling of Mohammed (example: Mahamed), you get a total of 7552 baby boys named that in England and Wales. No individual variant has more than 3300.

Now, let’s look at what happens if we count all the variants for some common English names (I just selected a few I thought would be common) (and, yes, I know Ransomed has also pointed this out - he hadn’t posted when I started crunching the numbers).

John - when I count up all the variants of John I can find (examples, Jon), I get 11,598 baby boys with name in England and Wales.

Henry (example variant: Henri), total comes to 8,389.

James: 9689

William: 8589

I also did Charles - it comes in just behind Mohammed, at 7081.

I chose 5 common names and compared them properly with Mohammed - comparing like with like, counting variations - and 4 of them came out ahead of Mohammed.

I’m not going to spend any more time on it, but Edward, Thomas - there’s a few others as well that would probably come out with high numbers.

So what’s the real story here?

In my view, it’s yet another example of how the media can manipulate facts to generate a sensational and not particularly honest story, if it chooses to.

Something I think people here should be aware of.”


18 posted on 11/30/2014 1:30:57 PM PST by naturalman1975 ("America was under attack. Australia was immediately there to help." - John Winston Howard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

Wanna bet the UK gets a bearded headchopper PM in 4-5 years?
Wanna bet the UK is forced to change its flag and get rid of the cross symbol?


19 posted on 11/30/2014 1:36:16 PM PST by I want the USA back (Media: completely irresponsible. Complicit in the destruction of this country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

Killing your unborn child will do that to a nation. Wonder what their population growth statistics are.


20 posted on 11/30/2014 1:57:43 PM PST by huldah1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

That everyone’s name is Muhammed is completely indicative of the total lack of creativity evident in Muslim societies.


21 posted on 11/30/2014 2:00:35 PM PST by Maceman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

mohammed was the worlds most popular choice for boys names 30 years ago. Just showing the shifting demographics of the UK


22 posted on 11/30/2014 2:01:07 PM PST by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish
Why would anybody name their child after a proven loser?

How about naming them adolph, or pol-pot, or Osama...Pathetic....Mohammad...Please!!

25 posted on 11/30/2014 2:48:20 PM PST by terycarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

They have sold their nation in the name of political correctness


26 posted on 11/30/2014 2:49:14 PM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

31 posted on 11/30/2014 4:14:40 PM PST by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson