Posted on 11/17/2014 5:41:49 PM PST by Morgana
So true, HiTech. he people who most push loveless lifeless sex, look miserable-— ever notice their protests and so forth? Their faces in action, in speech and shouting and even “song”, are bitter, harsh; their faces in repose are not peaceful.
One of the things love is, is jealous (not envious, jealous). And when it is treated as something common, the jealousy slops over onto everything it touches and become a pollution rather than a guardian. The result is, yes, the ugliness you have described.
Her physical appearance is not relevant. In her soul is a moral abomination ... THAT is relevant.
Mao made the same argument about Death.
That stopped me right there!....lol...”realized the implications of the fact......the “FACT” is...YOU screwed up 24 weeks ago..not your damned uterus!
The two go hand in hand.
She never had any intention of having an abortion, but she’s a liberal and feels the need to support abortion. So she wakes up one day and “suddenly discovers” she can’t legally have an abortion where she lives, and is sorry because she forgot to put “have an abortion by this date” in her to-do app.
I truly wish that the level of lying, of rank stupidity, immaturity, deceit and moral depravity she is displaying was unique to her, and not the fingerprints of liberals in general.
But it is.
It is totally narcissistic murder. We know that. The child.is murdered because the child interferes with the parent.
Any fool who calls the child a clump of cells is a murdering liar.
The sexual revolution wasn't about sexual freedom. It was about REVOLUTION. It was designed to “smash monogamy”, “smash the patriarchy”, and “smash the state”.
Destruction of the “nuclear family” has largely been achieved.
Free love isn't free, it leaves a trail of human debris.
Socialists don't care about broken eggs when they are making omelets.
I wasn’t talking about “unintended pregnancies”, I was talking about women who think sleeping around is just part of the game.
However, those women don’t seem to realize the consequences of that action.
The reason is .. instant gratification is all they are looking for .. and a child was never part of the picture.
So, therefore, it was HER responsibility to protect herself.
Then, the only thing a selfish person thinks of doing is getting rid of the evidence that she’s sleeping around. And, this is the main reason abortion is so popular in the first place. But, if she had used protection, nobody would have known she was sleeping around; and she wouldn’t now be contemplating an abortion.
Plus, the best part of using birth control - about 99% less chance of breast cancer.
Dubious, since:
Well .. there is “research” which specifically shows that the first bodily changes after being impregnated are the milk glands in the breasts.
And .. what they won’t tell women .. WHERE THE CANCERS ARE LOCATED IN THE BREASTS .. the milk glands.
So, people can rely on the “Internation” stats if that’s their choice .. and they can ignore the truth.
I have a family member who almost died from using Ortho-Novum .. but fortunately, a great doctor figured it out and saved her life. However, there are still other methods of contraception if people really do not wish to have children at that time.
If your breasts develop fully mature mammary tissue with the first pregnancy (without interruption) and then are used as intended to produce milk and feed baby, the incidence of cancer --- while not 100% eliminated -- is substantially reduced. Almost like there was some kind of design.
Sorry, I don’t need lessons in breast feeding.
LOL. It was for other readers— perhpos there are ne or two who are interested in the topic you brought up about minimizing their breast cancer risk.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.