1 posted on
11/15/2014 2:28:07 PM PST by
BenLurkin
To: BenLurkin
Like LA has the money to build all those venues needed?
2 posted on
11/15/2014 2:29:35 PM PST by
SkyDancer
(I Was Told Nobody Is Perfect But Yet, Here I Am)
To: BenLurkin
Considering the Olympics have been a fiscally losing venture for a long time
LA would be perfect location...
They are used to throwing money down the sewer
6 posted on
11/15/2014 2:36:31 PM PST by
Popman
To: BenLurkin
only if running for your life becomes an olympic event.
11 posted on
11/15/2014 2:47:13 PM PST by
JohnBrowdie
(http://forum.stink-eye.net)
To: BenLurkin
With the amount of money they’ll lose, they could build a couple of more bullet trains to nowhere.
19 posted on
11/15/2014 2:56:38 PM PST by
catnipman
(Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
To: BenLurkin
To: BenLurkin
If they want it in California have it in Fresno. They love wasying money they don’t have. When I was finishing college they built a stupid stadium downtown that no one visits.
To: BenLurkin
Because of global warming, in ten years isn’t it supposed to be too hot to live and the Pacific Ocean will be lapping over the Colosseum. I guess the swimming and rowing events will be good.
27 posted on
11/15/2014 3:25:40 PM PST by
bubbacluck
(America 180)
To: BenLurkin
They just want a "home" field advantage.
28 posted on
11/15/2014 3:36:34 PM PST by
RightGeek
(FUBO and the donkey you rode in on)
To: BenLurkin
we should lobby the IOC not to give it to LA
33 posted on
11/15/2014 3:50:42 PM PST by
GeronL
(Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson