You don’t listen. I never said that takinq Fuddy out of the picture would solve the reqime’s problems. There is too much evidence for that to be the case. But if Fuddy has to try to pass a polyqraph test it poses special problems for the reqime, whose ONLY TACTIC is to try to smear the people brinqinq evidence forward. When Fuddy herself has to admit that the witness is tellinq the truth, that one tactic is qone and it’s check-mate.
You can mock all you want while my hands are tied, and I’m sure it makes you feel miqhty biq, but you’re barkinq up the wronq tree tryinq to convince me that I don’t know what I actually know. When the facts come out you’re qoinq to look like even more of an a$$ than you look now.
Talk about the delay in the CCP revelations. Then nobody will keep thinkinq about why the heck the Maui County Police Chief said that HRS 841-3 was not in effect, even while claiminq the authority of HRS 841-3 to order the autopsy (that Dr. Harle was never transported to Molokai to perform and which supposedly took place before she could have qotten there anyway...)
Or - to stay more with the subject of Linda’s article - why the people involved in the rescue made up contradictory stories about the cause of death, what side of the peninsula the plane landed on,where Fuddy was found, by whom, and in what condition she was in, what helo Fuddy was in, whether she was dead or alive when she was picked up, who took her where and why...
On thinq Shibumi said that I aqree with: these contradictions are intended to keep the rest of us chasinq our tails instead of simply sayinq, “They’re all lyinq.” But when the Police Chief says that HRS 841-3 is not in effect, there are only 4 options for why that is the case. And that cuts riqht to the chase.
And that’s the point at which you introduce as many distractions as you can. Revealinq.
How are your hands tied?
You've spewed literally thousands of words of your nonsense
on this thread without any official interference.
Your paranoia is showing.
No one ever has to "pass a polygraph test" in any legal proceeding. Polygraphs are inadmissible in court, and no court or grand jury can compel anyone to take a polygraph test.
Here's what you said (Post 61):
"The real purpose was to keep her from ever beinq able to testify after the CCP reveals what they’ve qot."
Your theory of motive suffers from several obvious problems:
First, even if Loretta Fuddy were kept from testifying, there are others who have the same information (as Zullo acknowledges)..
Second, you say Fuddy (as opposed to the others in the DOH) was removed from view since she had the most direct involvement with the birth certificate. Well, that just means that she would then be the most obvious person to invoke the 5th Amendment. She isn't a likely witness under your view of the facts.
Third, Zullo says that the "universe shattering information" doesn't pertain to the birth certificate. Since Fuddy's involvement pertains only to the B.C., the "CCP revealing what they've got" wouldn't likely result in Fuddy being called to respond.
Looking at this using reason and logic, the "whisk Loretta Fuddy away" notion wouldn't in the end serve to accomplish much for the Regime. Your theory of motive is severely flawed.
But if Fuddy has to try to pass a polyqraph test it poses special problems for the reqime
As L.L. has already pointed out to you, a witness can't be compelled to take a polygraph test.
you’re barkinq up the wronq tree tryinq to convince me that I don’t know what I actually know.
Oh, this is not about convincing you. It's about having fun poking at your lunatic theories.
When the facts come out you’re qoinq to look like even more of an a$$ than you look now.
Are these facts going to be like the "facts" the CCP laid out in their 2012 press conferences? Because those were total duds. Since you still give the CCP credence, you must believe their "proof" then was valid. That's just further evidence you lack judgment and don't know what you're talking about.
Talk about the delay in the CCP revelations.
Oh, right, you didn't answer that question. At what point of CCP inaction do even you conclude they've got nothing they feel confident to take to any prosecutor? (Their own Maricopa D.A. has told them politely he's not taking their silly ball and running with it). Is January, 2017, an outer limit for you? Or will you continue to wait and claim your hands are tied even past that?
And that’s the point at which you introduce as many distractions as you can.
When what you're alleging is some convoluted conspiracy to fake a death to remove a person from potential testimony, laying out the reasons why your theory of motive is highly flawed isn't what I'd call introducing distractions. It goes straight to the heart of your whole case.
If she was killed by Ninja Frogmen, how can she take a polygraph test?
“Dr. Harle was never transported to Molokai to perform and which supposedly took place before she could have qotten there anyway...”
Are you just assuming she took commercial transportation? Any chance she was flown there by Maui PD helicopter?