A reminder that you began this whole foray by butting into my post to Ray, accusing me of "mind-numbing stupidity." You set the stage here; don't complain when the spotlight on you gets a bit heated.
The primary accusation against you is you lack the intellectual capacity and/or forthrightness to answer to this, my primary point on the topic, which was "eligibility."
But, come now, Hawaii's verification of Obama's birth facts is HIGHLY RELEVANT to the question of Obama's birth; so relevant, in fact, that it moots your inquiry into things like "photos of the birth home" or "persons who witnessed Stanley Ann pregnant" (though Dr. Sinclair obviously was one such person).
So, yeah, I assert you have the debating skills of a grade-schooler.
You don't like that? Tough. Grow a skin.
It is just an amazing coincidence, isnt it, that at the very time when somecertainly not allbut some birthers believe Stanley Ann was in Kenya, there is no trace of her in HI.
I don't consider that strange; I consider it just another example of Birther inconsistency. If the supposed absence of "pregnancy witnesses" or "birth home photos" or "witnesses to the father-mother relationship" is an argument against the claim Obama was born in Hawaii, then all the more so it's an argument that negates the claim of a Kenyan birth, because there is no such evidence pointing to a pregnant Stanley Ann being there.
But, of course, Birthers can't see this.
They simply assume Stanley Ann was there. That assumption is necessary to their narrative.
But that belief is supported by other things: like the birth announcements, like Obama, Sr's INS file records, like the Indonesian school application submitted by Lola and S.A., like S.A.'s state department/passport file. And above all, it's supported by the affirmation by the State of Hawaii, which, after all, is the thing (state certification) which every other American uses when they need to prove birth facts for things like drivers' license, passport application, marriage license, etc.
So anti-Birthers have a lot of evidence. And that 800-pound gorilla is now up to about 825 due to sitting around eating while you figure out how to answer.
‘The primary accusation against you is you lack the intellectual capacity and/or forthrightness to answer to this, my primary point on the topic, which was “eligibility.”’
Two falsehoods in one sentence. You must be getting excited.
Oh, so you don’t consider it strange that no one remembers Stanley Ann being in HI while her pregnancy was becoming more and more noticeable. You don’t consider it odd that no one has any idea where she lived. It’s perfectly normal in your mind that not even their mutual acquaintances had any idea they even knew each other, much less had a relationship. Etc. Etc.
You are do deep in the Obot tank you will never come up for air. You are beyond hope. Any normal human being can see there is an issue. Only the most extreme Obots are completely blind when it comes to Obama’s countless lies.