‘The primary accusation against you is you lack the intellectual capacity and/or forthrightness to answer to this, my primary point on the topic, which was “eligibility.”’
Two falsehoods in one sentence. You must be getting excited.
Oh, so you don’t consider it strange that no one remembers Stanley Ann being in HI while her pregnancy was becoming more and more noticeable. You don’t consider it odd that no one has any idea where she lived. It’s perfectly normal in your mind that not even their mutual acquaintances had any idea they even knew each other, much less had a relationship. Etc. Etc.
You are do deep in the Obot tank you will never come up for air. You are beyond hope. Any normal human being can see there is an issue. Only the most extreme Obots are completely blind when it comes to Obama’s countless lies.
What falsehood? This has been my major point on eligibility: --
But, come now, Hawaii's verification of Obama's birth facts is HIGHLY RELEVANT to the question of Obama's birth; so relevant, in fact, that it moots your inquiry into things like "photos of the birth home" or "persons who witnessed Stanley Ann pregnant" (though Dr. Sinclair obviously was one such person). --
And you've never addressed it. So the charge you lack the intellectual capacity and/or forthrightness to do so is quite true.
I'm not excitd, I'm bored.
As to the rest, you're just repeating stuff I answered multiple times on the prior thread.