Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: CpnHook

Those laws are meant to protect the society. MY riqht to have those laws enforced is beinq infrinqed.

And the whole “The MCPD has a different interpretation of HRS 841-3” bunk doesn’t fly. They set up a case number to investiqate Fuddy’s death after they were told the circumstances of that “death” because they interpreted HRS 841-3 exactly as I do - and they responded to my requests the way they did because they acknowledqed that I was understandinq it correctly reqardinq the need for sworn witness statements. They know what the law says.

And then later they chanqed it to an “Outside Assistance” case for Makani Kai property damaqe.

Somethinq chanqed their mind miqhty quick, after they had already displayed a perfect understandinq of what HRS 841-3 says. What do you think chanqed their mind?


234 posted on 11/13/2014 10:46:17 AM PST by butterdezillion (Note to self : put this between arrow keys: img src=""/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies ]


To: butterdezillion
And the whole “The MCPD has a different interpretation of HRS 841-3” bunk doesn’t fly.

When you're whole "Fuddy is actually alive" theory takes flight in the eyes of anyone but you, let me know. So you don't like my suppositions. I'm the one here aligned with the people of Hawaii in not seeing any real issue.

Somethinq chanqed their mind miqhty quick, after they had already displayed a perfect understandinq of what HRS 841-3 says. What do you think chanqed their mind?

I don't know. Maybe they thought that was a better way to classify the matter given that apart from conducting the autopsy, there wasn't much to be done, so the ongoing matters were more in the direction of the crash investigation. Or maybe calling it an "outside assistance" case means they get to bill the matter to a different internal accounting code that doesn't deplete their main budget. Or maybe it was something else.

But while we're playing the question and answer game, how about this one? If the theory is these discrepancies are all about some conspiracy to get Loretta Fuddy out of view because the CCP was looming, then why is Yamamoto still in the picture? He would likely have the same information about the birth certificate that Fuddy did (heck, all he'd need to do is go to the vault and know what's going down). But certainly he MUST know about the circumstances of the "let's take Loretta away" plot. He was right there with her after the crash. The CCP is still grinding away towards that Day when their "criminal investigation" culminates - not with indictments and arrests, as a real criminal investigation with real jurisdiction and real evidence would -- but with a Press Conference!! [eyeroll] So why leave Yamamoto within their grasp to bust the whole conspiracy?

239 posted on 11/13/2014 11:37:26 AM PST by CpnHook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies ]

To: butterdezillion; CpnHook

Where in 841-3 or 841-4 does it say that sworn witness statements are required to be taken in a complete investigation?

http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/histatutes/5/38/841/841-3

http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/histatutes/5/38/841/841-4


244 posted on 11/13/2014 11:53:48 AM PST by 4Zoltan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson