To: SunkenCiv
I find the find fascinating. However, the statements made with such certainty are laughable: ‘But it was not a kind of slave labour of children. They were involved to share common values, to join something important to all the people.’ 6000 years ago, and these researchers think they can get into the minds, culture, and motivations of an ancient civilization they just discovered.
12 posted on
11/06/2014 7:49:28 PM PST by
Nevadan
To: Nevadan; BenLurkin
18 posted on
11/06/2014 8:03:53 PM PST by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_______________________Celebrate the Polls, Ignore the Trolls)
To: Nevadan
They were involved to share common values, to join something important to all the people.’ 6000 years ago, and these researchers think they can get into the minds, culture, and motivations of an ancient civilization they just discovered.Yeah. It was obviously of great religious significance...
Snort! Well, I almost typed it with a straight face...(8^D)
22 posted on
11/06/2014 8:52:23 PM PST by
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
To: Nevadan
Well, it was a homeshool project. And the researchers forgot to include the fact that nearby a stone CD was found that had a recording of these children singing “We Are the World; We Are the Children”.
29 posted on
11/07/2014 4:59:06 AM PST by
Bigg Red
(Too many productive Americans are POWs in the War on Poverty.)
To: Nevadan
6000 years ago, and these researchers think they can get into the minds, culture, and motivations of an ancient civilization they just discovered. They actually say they haven't even found any other traces of the culture. It would be just as valid for them to say that it was made by slaves imported from India.
"Science"
30 posted on
11/07/2014 7:25:01 AM PST by
Straight Vermonter
(Posting from deep behind the Maple Curtain)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson