[C19fan]

BS meter off the chart.

[RushIsMyTeddyBear]

IOW, he doesn’t exist.

[IronJack]

She was never raped. She’s an out-and-out liar wannabe sympathy whore.

[lesko]

What’s the deal with this chick?

[longfellow]

Never happened, the only truth to this story is this will be the only way she has sex.

[PGR88]

And of course, in this story, he’s a REPUBLICAN.

Did she get to the part yet where he’s also a respected Christian minister, has a beautiful blonde wife, drives a huge pick-up truck, owns several “automatic weapons,” is an oil-fracking tycoon and close advisor to Ted Cruz?

[Jim from C-Town]

IE: She was never raped! At least it wasn’t rape, rape!

[Attention Surplus Disorder]

This tubby little turdette needs to refund her 15 minutes of semi-fame before penalties and interest kick in.

[Williams]

If this is the story I read in her own words, there was no rape even IF it actually happened.

She was talking dirty to the guy during sex, another guy asked her not to take this guy home and she said get lost, she was drunk and on cocaine and she threw the guy out naked when she discovered he wasn’t using the condom.

Rape?

[Buckeye McFrog]

Any woman who thinks her rapist is not a “clear-cut villain” needs to spend the rest of her life on a
psychiatrist’s couch.

[exit82]

Like Obama’s girlfriend in his book, this event isn’t a real memory, but a combination of events and people that may or may not have happened.

[Jim from C-Town]

Brings to mind the old question ‘Is it possible to rape a prostitute?’

[jimbo123]

[TexasGator]

Briebart ads now in Spanish ....

[Apparatchik]

This is what happens when you make sh!t up. She alleges she was raped (for the sympathy and credentials as a womyn’s advocate) and when folks ask how come she hasn’t filed charges or identified her attacker, she backpedals and says he’s not a “clear-cut villain.” Sounds like it wasn’t “rape-rape” in the words of another famous gender/race-baiter.

[Rodamala]

Just this morning on my drive in to work, on the radio was a story of a local rape trial. The jury deliberated for an hour after the facts were presented and even if it were true that there was sexual intimacy between the alleged victim, and the accused on the night in question, it was not rape. The accused was found not guilty.

So, now what?

What recourse is there to protect from these sort of insinuations and misrepresentations of fact?

I mean, even if a guy stays celibate... he is open for being completely destroyed by these sociopaths.

[Tolerance Sucks Rocks]

According to our own reporting, Dunham has not volunteered to cooperate with authorities in order to get her rapist off the street. Early Saturday morning, Dunham appeared to tweet excuses for the man she claims raped her. During a book tour appearance earlier this month, Dunham told Howard Stern that not all rapists are "straight-forward villains."

Chicks dig jerks.

[Chode]

feh...

[headstamp 2]

“Dunham told Howard Stern that not all rapists are “straight-forward villains.”

Good thing she isn’t a Republican running for political office.

[Rummyfan]

For the reason that he doesn’t exist. Rape Lena Dunham? C’mon!

[greatvikingone]

“BS meter off the chart.”

Making it harder for real victims of rape to pursue charges.