I agree. While I am not following the election in Texas closely, stripping away the Republican/Democrat labels, it seems to me perfectly fair, even if inconvenient, to ask why it is okay to sue and take money, but then try and stop others from doing the same. It is hypocritical and I think should be addressed.
The allegation (or more accurately, insinuation) is really pathetic. But, typical of campaign hit ads. It tries to draw a parallel between his recovery of damages for an accident caused by a property owner’s disregard of a dangerous condition (a tree that fell on him) and his opposition as AG to disability status for someone who lost a leg, but when equipped with a prosthetic, was so nearly as capable as before the loss, that she did not qualify as disabled. That requires some thought process to understand and distinguish, and the ads are pandering to voters who cannot understand or make the distinction.