[Reno89519]

I agree. While I am not following the election in Texas closely, stripping away the Republican/Democrat labels, it seems to me perfectly fair, even if inconvenient, to ask why it is okay to sue and take money, but then try and stop others from doing the same. It is hypocritical and I think should be addressed.

[Darteaus94025]

It should be addressed, and it could be hypocritical.

That said, you never let your opponent frame the debate, i.e. start talking about your shortcomings, mistakes, oversights, etc.

Explaining exactly why one lawsuit is different from others will not end the discussion. Wendy will keep asking about it because, once it's addressed, she's starting to get traction on a subject that she, and the Democrats, will insist is hypocritical - whether it is or not.

She's beaten now. Don't debate, don't answer her questions, don't address her allegations, just appear above the fray. Look like a governor, and let her look like a desperate, grasping loser.

If the issue is addressed, have it done by a flack who immediately brings up some flaw/hypocrisy/lie on her part.

[ontap]

AGs aren’t suppose to conduct the states business on what seems fair ...they’re suppose to follow the law!!