Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/10/2014 3:32:56 PM PDT by right-wing agnostic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: right-wing agnostic; ConservingFreedom; Unam Sanctam; x_plus_one; Patton@Bastogne; ...

The Demons are on the run!


2 posted on 10/10/2014 3:35:08 PM PDT by narses ( For the Son of man shall come ... and then will he render to every man according to his works.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: right-wing agnostic

Nah, the democrats just been binging on pot and it will be temporary. When they sober they will be back with the tribe of ignorant and they will return their normal ignorant self.


4 posted on 10/10/2014 3:43:50 PM PDT by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: right-wing agnostic

The only war on women is democrats hatred of any woman who challenges them


5 posted on 10/10/2014 3:44:56 PM PDT by realcleanguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: right-wing agnostic

This is the first mail in ballot only so they look to not support a failing cause. Uterus Udall has seriously backfired.


6 posted on 10/10/2014 3:50:09 PM PDT by mountainlion (Live well for those that did not make it back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: right-wing agnostic

Nah. The race is much closer based on every other poll. That’s just one PAC of many.


7 posted on 10/10/2014 4:20:06 PM PDT by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: right-wing agnostic

The dopers got what they wanted, now they don’t give a rats ass who wins. They are too stoned to care.

Probably why the Chickenpooper made his remarks about the dope being a mistake.


8 posted on 10/10/2014 4:22:32 PM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: right-wing agnostic

Has nobody here noticed that the LIBERAL Denver Post just endorsed Gardner this afternoon?


11 posted on 10/10/2014 4:45:45 PM PDT by G Larry (Which of Obama's policies do you think I'd support if he were white?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: right-wing agnostic

Unless other money replaces this, it’s great news for Republicans.

If you want to see what candidate is ahead, you always follow the money trail. If Colorado falls, the Republicans likely take the Senate.


12 posted on 10/10/2014 4:51:29 PM PDT by NYRepublican72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: right-wing agnostic

Colorado is in the bag. Imo. So is Alaska and Arkansas. Louisiana and Iowa will fall next. Add in Montana, West Virginia and South Dakota, and that’s 8 seat steals.

Allowing a loss or two in Georgia Kentucky and/or Kansas to get +6 needed.


14 posted on 10/10/2014 5:05:18 PM PDT by nhwingut (This tagline for lease)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: right-wing agnostic

The commie ‘RATs already played the pothead “legalize it and tax the hell out of it” card. They have no way to get the potheads to the polls in November now. The potheads got what they wanted.


16 posted on 10/10/2014 5:07:59 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Got Ebola? Come to America! Die and have the family sue whitey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: right-wing agnostic

That’s impressive if it turns out.
Colorado went hard left very quickly.
From +5 Bush in 2004 to +5 Baraq in 2012

(disregarding 2008 when Baraq was in his Messiah phase and was +9)


19 posted on 10/10/2014 5:43:37 PM PDT by nascarnation (Toxic Baraq Syndrome: hopefully infecting a Dem candidate near you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson