[Patton@Bastogne]

.


If the "official" Democrats lose the Senate ...

then you already KNOW that their "half-brothers" (Mitch "Limp" McConnell, et al) will GLADLY vote for Obama's socialist agenda ...

That's why Obama keeps smiling ... "that" ... and thinking about his next Thursday night date with Reggie Love ...


.

[Col Frank Slade]

Can’t wait to see Debbie Downer election night.

[Maceman]

If the "official" Democrats lose the Senate ... then you already KNOW that their "half-brothers" (Mitch "Limp" McConnell, et al) will GLADLY vote for Obama's socialist agenda ...

Even now the Republican leadership is lowering expectations about what they'll do if they take the Senate in 2014.

And then there’s John McCain saying what will happen if the Republicans win the Senate: “I will work very hard to go back to 60 votes,” said Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), who boldly predicts a Republican Senate would process Obama’s nominees “more rapidly than [Democrats] do today.”

And as for the House: John Boehner: ‘Very Few’ Republicans Will Oppose Me

So tell me again how much better off we'll be voting for the Uniparty RINOcrats.

[Fraxinus]

then you already KNOW that their "half-brothers" (Mitch "Limp" McConnell, et al) will GLADLY vote for Obama's socialist agenda ...

I think you are being unfair to McConnell. I expect him to continue his pattern of negotiating any legislation incrementally rightward. He has two problems, getting any legislation passed that is more conservative than the most liberal republican can support is unlikely to happen, and Boehner is likely to continue his pattern of highly conservative show votes and supporting Obama's agenda in its entirety.

As a practical matter without the full support of his caucus and House leadership, the most McConnell can do is force votes that make Dems squirm.