Posted on 10/04/2014 12:55:56 AM PDT by right-wing agnostic
Islam is violent and repressive, and its sacred texts are the heart of darkness at the center of the Islamic State's inspiration and motivation, despite Barack Obama's assertions in September 10th's address to the nation that the Islamic State "is not Islamic" and that "no religion condones the killing of innocents." Violence is an integral part of Islamic doctrine, following the example set by its Prophet Mohammed, and in the name of Islam and Allah, Muslims have been murdering innocents, since 656 AD.
Six hundred years after Mohammed, one of Islam's most respected scholars, Ibn Khuldan wrote 'Muqaddimah' (Introduction to History), which explained: "In the Muslim community, the holy war is religious duty, because of the universalism of the Muslim mission and [the obligation to] convert everybody to Islam either by persuasion or force."
Like most good Muslims, Khaldun's inspiration came from 'The Verse of the Sword', Sura 9:5, "revealed" towards the end of Mohammed's life, as well as similar themes previous to Sura 9:
Sura 9:5__ “...kill the Mushrikun (unbelievers) wherever you find them ... But if they repent and perform As-Salat/ Iqamat-as-Salat [the Islamic ritual prayers], then leave their way free..." Also Sura 9:33__ "It is He [Allah] Who has sent His Messenger [Mohammed] with guidance and the religion of truth [Islam], to make it superior over all religions..."
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
I honestly believe as a lot of people say, Islam is not a religion, it’s a government (Sharia), it’s a Theocracy. That’s what the manifesto by the lady at the Gun Cave says and that’s true. Not to plug what she is saying.
In Saudi Arabia, right, they cut off hands for stealing?? Well, the Government is doing that following Islam. So is it the religion doing it? The government doing it? Sharia Law doing it? It obviously is a bit complex.
“8) I have no way of looking at Islam other than as a theocracy, not a religion. Islam is undoubtedly the union of political, legal, and religious ideologies. In other words law, religion and state are forged together to form what Muslims refer to as “The Nation of Islam.” Once again it is given the sovereign qualities of a nation with clerics in the governing body and Sharia law all in one. This is a Theocracy, not a religion.”
Just to me, her mini-manifesto is right on mark.
I am not familiar with Justin Smith’s writings, but this AT article by him is outstanding. I say that not because he agrees with my views on Islam but because he tells the truth. Thanks for posting.
Bump
Bump for later
If the non-Islam world were to unite and crush Islam into extinction, the previous Muslim population would have nothing to tie itself together.
Extinct Islam would leave an enormous vacuum such that in the wake of the extinction a self-organizing process around budding leaders would be based on something yet unknown.
Following extinction of Islam at least a hundred years would ensue where the name and history of Mohammed and the Koran would necessarily be forbidden.
A billion people without direction could give rise to something worse that what exists now.
Martyrdom must necessarily become a prevented path and its ‘glory’ must be replaced with the notion of demented insanity.
The burden on the Non-Islam world to accomplish this extinction would be so great as to require a hatred and force that could be just as dangerous as Islam itself.
An ancient Roman approach would have such people enslaved and kept so busy there would be no time or opportunity to self-organize.
Similar to a Roman approach a Stalinist approach would have such people put on trains and sent to collectives to work until they dropped from exhaustion or from bullets.
Christianity today could not convert Muslims because Muslims have already cleverly decided that Jesus was a lesser Prophet and not God in the flesh. Obviously this was done to neuter the spread of Christianity throughout the conquered Muslim world.
Muslims without Mohammed and the Koran would be left with no guiding principles and no history. Likely they would go underground and become dangerous.
Mustafa Kemal ‘Atatürk’ was successful in squelching Islam from the public square but only for about 90 years as Islam now emerges again in Turkey.
A study of the life of Atatürk may hold the key to finding a long term solution to quashing or mitigating Islam.
Any solution to ridding the world of the Islamic menace is not going to be pretty and will require brutal force, hence Christianity is not a means to accomplish the eradication or pacification.
The eradication or dampening of Islam to a social murmur by driving it underground must necessarily be persistent and forever; a huge undertaking and enormous burden.
Perhaps an Islamic ‘Joseph Smith’ will arise who will miraculously find in his backyard a golden book of Mohammed previously unseen that will have Mohammed’s words prohibit any violence in the life of any observant Muslim. This would not work either as it is violence that holds the notion of Islam together.
One thing seems certain, Islam is completely Un-American and can never be assimilated into American Society. America has been able to absorb all other cultures except for Islam which refuses to be Americanized.
Muslims must see themselves for what they are, a new Nazi-like phenomena and they must squelch themselves as Atatürk had them do.
Here’s a clip that should be repeated in myriad ways throughout America and the rest of the world especially to Muslims everywhere:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ry3NzkAOo3s
Bald faced liars.
There Will Be No Peace Until There Is No Islam.
You sir, have penned a manifesto for survival that every “infidel” should embrace.
There is no solution to the Islamic murdering masses. There is only the resolve to survive, & the prudence to not be the first to run out of bullets.
islam = satan’s death cult
allah = make-believe pagan moon idol
islam = leftwing political movement - the same as leftwing communism - with same goals as leftwing communism
islam = satanic evil
islam = leftwing political movement with same goals as leftwing communism
Blood In / Blood Out
Dear Leader was entirely correct in this assertion. Islam does not condone the killing of innocents.
They do, however, use a rather different definition of "innocents" than most of us.
He’s also right when he says no religion condones killing innocents.
But the cult of islam is not a religion.
Islam meets every single legal, constitutional and dictionary definition for a religion.
I agree it is not JUST a religion, but it doesn’t cease to be a religion because it incorporates legal and political aspects. By this definition the Catholicism of the Middle Ages wasn’t a religion. It was every bit as entwined with all other aspects of life as Islam is today.
What those who hold this position are doing, I think, is assuming, without any justification, that “religion” can or should be redefined to exclude “bad religions.”
I think that’s just silly. Religions, like any other aspect of human existence, can be good or bad. Christianity and Buddhism generally good. Islam, Aztec and Thuggee, generally bad.
This POV has a disturbing side, since it often seems to be aimed at removing constitutional protection from Islam. This means, of course, that some government agency or court will be given the power to designate some religions as protected under 1A and other not.
I think that’s a very bad idea indeed. Why couldn’t they make a determination that religions that promote “hate” be no longer protected?
ISLAM RELIGION OF THE SWORD
Obama’s father was Muslim, and in Islamic law, he was Muslim by birth. He was educated as Muslim in Indonesia, the most populated Muslim country in the world. Obama knows their prayers, and praised them as the most beautiful sound in the world. He studied the ”holy” Koran and Muhammad teachings.
Obama knows well the bloody history of Islam, but he still call it a “religion of peace”, even though that in the name of Allah more than220 millions infidels have been slaughtered by Muslim, since the prophet of Allah beheaded in 627 AD over 700 hundred men and the pubescent boys and enslaved the women and children. In doing this, he wiped entirely the last remaining major tribe of Jews in Medina: the Qurayza.
We might see beheading in U.S. spreading as a virus more mortal than Ebola.
It is a well known fact the bloody history of Islam, but he still call it a “religion of peace”, even though that in the name of Allah more than 220 millions infidels have been slaughtered by Muslim, since the prophet of Allah beheaded in 627 AD over 700 hundred men and the pubescent boys and enslaved the women and children. In doing this, he wiped entirely the last remaining major tribe of Jews in Medina: the Qurayza.
Beheading is Islam M.O., That’s Why Mohammed Owned a Sword Named “Cleaver of Vertebrae”
Posted By Daniel Greenfield On September 30, 2014
Islam really is the religion of the sword. Mohammed had a huge sword collection, a lot of them stolen from other people, and he gave a name to each of his swords because he was kind of a psycho. One of his favorite swords was Dhu al-Faqar or “Cleaver of Vertebrae”. When you see this kind of sword on a Jihadist flag, that’s ole Faqar. Muslim legend says that the sword was given to Mohammed by an angel. Actually he looted it in battle or his followers did.”
“Dhu al-Faqar is the name of this sword, taken as Booty by the prophet Muhammad at the Battle of Badr. It is reported that the prophet Muhammad gave the sword to Ali b. Abi Talib, and that Ali returned from the Battle of Uhud covered with blood from his hands to his shoulders, having Dhu al-Faqar with him. “
To avoid the fate of Lebanon o Eurasia, mass deportation of Muslims is in order. Close the door to more Muslim immigration. Close Mosques involve in promotion of hate against US or promoting Islamic terrorism.
As the good book says: Matthew 7:15
“Watch out for false prophets. They come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ferocious wolves.”
Theocracy is a form of government in which a deity is officially recognized as the civil Ruler and official policy is governed by officials regarded as divinely guided, or is pursuant to the doctrine of a particular religion or religious group.[1][2][3]
It’s as much as a Theocracy as a religion, this is a scholarly debate, maybe it isn’t even a religion. I read one article that said that the Koran/Islam’s goal is the overthrow of the Government for Sharia law. That in itself may be breaking the law. We need to get a handle on this.
If in fact it meets the denitiin of religion, i dont know. I dont know much about the inquisition, but i agree that periid of time was not good pr for the Catholic church.
But that was a different time. People thought the earth was flat.
In our curren atmosphere of banning things that aren’t good for you, one would think Islam would be at the top of that list. But, somehow, in the warped liberal mindset, it hasn’t made the link st. It has however made the protected class list.
Im going now to beat my head against the wall.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.