Skip to comments.
Ruth Bader Ginsburg: Citizens United Was The Current Supreme Court's
Huffington Post ^
| September 28, 2014
Posted on 09/28/2014 8:50:00 PM PDT by Steelfish
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
1
posted on
09/28/2014 8:50:00 PM PDT
by
Steelfish
To: Steelfish
Ginsburg, Kagan, Sotomayor are nothing but plain political hacks.
2
posted on
09/28/2014 8:51:04 PM PDT
by
Steelfish
(ui)
To: Steelfish
Go suck a lemon, Ginsburg!
3
posted on
09/28/2014 8:51:24 PM PDT
by
Viennacon
To: Steelfish
Right, because Roberts' Obamacare ruling wasn't bad in her eyes.
-PJ
4
posted on
09/28/2014 8:52:46 PM PDT
by
Political Junkie Too
(If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
To: Steelfish
Unions get to spend as much money as they want, though, because they support Democrats.
5
posted on
09/28/2014 8:54:26 PM PDT
by
E. Pluribus Unum
("The man who damns money obtained it dishonorably; the man who respects it earned it." --Ayn Rand)
To: Steelfish
“Ginsburg, Kagan, Sotomayor are nothing but plain political hacks.”
We need a list of the Republican Senators who voted to confirm them.
6
posted on
09/28/2014 8:55:53 PM PDT
by
Pelham
(California, what happens when you won't deport illegals)
To: Steelfish
That’s funny as hell considering how many huge corporations are controlled by flaming liberals.
7
posted on
09/28/2014 8:57:06 PM PDT
by
Mastador1
(I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
To: Steelfish
8
posted on
09/28/2014 8:59:00 PM PDT
by
Gay State Conservative
(Islamopobia:The Irrational Fear Of Being Beheaded)
To: Steelfish
Do sitting justices often publicly criticize rulings with which they disagree?
9
posted on
09/28/2014 9:07:33 PM PDT
by
Steely Tom
(Thank you for self-censoring.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
She is right if she points out that unions, corporations, organizations, PAC's, parties etc have the advantage over the individual in terms of donation limits.
10
posted on
09/28/2014 9:15:14 PM PDT
by
Theoria
(I should never have surrendered. I should have fought until I was the last man alive)
To: Steelfish
11
posted on
09/28/2014 9:16:57 PM PDT
by
rockinqsranch
((Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will. They ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.))
To: Steelfish; All
JUST..
HEY!..Ginsberg your only; saving grace, is your occupying "Holder's" USSC position.
be careful, you maybe brietbarted, by your friends/fellow travelers.
12
posted on
09/28/2014 9:17:23 PM PDT
by
skinkinthegrass
(The end move in political in always to pick up a weapon...eh? "Bathhouse" 0'Mullah? d8^)
To: Steely Tom
“Do sitting justices often publicly criticize rulings with which they disagree?”
I kinda think they shouldn’t be allowed to give media interviews,,, but that doesn’t square with The Constitution, unfortunately. But the interviews are unseemly.
Bogie
13
posted on
09/28/2014 9:24:44 PM PDT
by
Dr. Bogus Pachysandra
(Don't touch that thing Don't let anybody touch that thing!I'm a Doctor and I won't touch that thing!)
To: Steelfish
Ginsburg is simply looking for reasons to restrain Americans' rights. Her position is basically this:
The 1st Amendment guarantees the right of assembly and the right of free speech. You may choose to exercise only one of those rights at a time.
Seriously, why can't Americans simultaneously assemble as a corporation and exercise free speech at the same time? Always support leaders that expand individual freedoms.
14
posted on
09/28/2014 9:26:56 PM PDT
by
SSS Two
To: Steelfish
The old biddy needs to put a sock in it.
15
posted on
09/28/2014 9:29:27 PM PDT
by
boycott
To: rockinqsranch
I noted that too.
There is this idea out there that we are a democracy.
We are not a democracy.
We are a constitutional republic.
It should shock us that a Supreme Court justice doesn’t know this. But many other politicians say the same thing.
To: Steelfish
EVERY Union is a corporation.
Often international ones.
17
posted on
09/28/2014 10:01:55 PM PDT
by
NoLibZone
(The bad news: Hillary Clinton will be the next President. The Good news: Our principles are intact.)
To: boycott
“The old biddy needs to put a sock in it.”
_____________________________________________________
Exactly. She needs to maintain a modicum of professionalism and shut her damn pie hole.
I know that’s a lot to ask of a barking moonbat like Ruthie.
18
posted on
09/28/2014 10:04:31 PM PDT
by
july4thfreedomfoundation
(Politicians and diapers must be changed often for the same reason)
To: Steelfish
For once I agree with her.
19
posted on
09/28/2014 10:30:27 PM PDT
by
gunsequalfreedom
(Conservative is not a label of convenience. It is a guide to your actions.)
To: Steely Tom
What’s wrong with it? I mean, didn’t they publically disagree when they published their opinion on the case? I don’t see why it would even be a question.
20
posted on
09/28/2014 10:32:19 PM PDT
by
gunsequalfreedom
(Conservative is not a label of convenience. It is a guide to your actions.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson