My bet would be communications security monitoring in and out traffic from the base looking for espionage, if it were no 6 years into this administration or the actions of DHS since its inception.
I remember the eavesdropping measures to secure the “Cage” at Ft. Monmouth.
Sounds reasonable, yet the uncertainty is unnerving. These towers are conspicuous and it makes no sense that local planning/permits and such weren’t made aware of the legality of these structures. It’s unclear whether the reporters involved checked with local authorities for such documentation - if such exists for the type of surveilance you suggest.
Can, or perhaps I should ask, would you please explain?
Good assumption, but given the TREASONOUS BASTARD in the White House, they could very well be put there by ISIS or the chicoms with Hussein's blessings.