Posted on 08/22/2014 10:56:23 AM PDT by Citizen Zed
There is no ‘the computer’. Planes, and probably the car, have a LOT of computers. One can fail, several can fail, and the plane is still controllable. The probability for more than one failure to take out a plane is astronomically high. I am not just saying that. In the avionics industry we have to do the math and KNOW how likely is for something to completely take out a flight critical system. Is the Google car developed to those standards? Can they prove it? I highly doubt it.
Politicians/bureaucrats are much smarter and more honest than ordinary peasants.
Get in, plug in the address and sleep on the way there. I’m ready for it. I can only die once.
/johnny
Most of present day cars are controlled by the ‘computer’.
ABS, steering assist, Stability Control, throttle, braking ...
I’m in the avionics business myself; I have a rough idea of what’s involved in building/maintaining a Cat IIIc Autoland approach, and would hope a “driverless” car would be built to the same standards.
But, given the cost, I know they won’t be.
When I die, I want to die peacefully in my sleep like my Grandfather.
Not screaming like the passengers in the back of his car.
Cool to see a fellow FR who knows what DO-178b is!
I bet there very few.
There’s at least two.
I think it makes sense. Planes have autopilot, but pilots can disable it and control things manually. An autopilot system in a car might be able to do 90% of the routine parts of a journey, but it makes sense for a human to take over as needed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.