“If Paterno knew in 2001 that the abuse was of a sexual nature and failed to demand Sandusky’s immediate arrest, that’s a smoking gun and the entire rationale of Zeigler’s documentary collapses. So Penn State trustee Anthony Lubrano alleges, without offering a shred of evidence, that the ailing Paterno must’ve been coached prior to his grand jury testimony, while also taking at face value Paterno’s laughable claim to not know what sodomy is.”
http://www.phillymag.com/news/2012/11/14/movie-defending-joe-paterno-contemptible/
You keep on trusting louis freeh - and the writers who never even read the report (include yourself here) - just his summary, which was nothing short of a joke when compared to the actual evidence.
I’ll trust Joe. And Sue.