Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: LurkingSince'98

I am rejecting him completely. NO human can be G-d in the flesh. It is heretical and blasphemous to say that a man can be G-d.


53 posted on 08/02/2014 3:35:50 PM PDT by POWERSBOOTHEFAN (Well......Bye.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: POWERSBOOTHEFAN
It is heretical and blasphemous to say that a man can be G-d.

What is heretical and blasphemous about it?

When God becomes Man, he does not shed His divine nature. He can't, since He is eternally God; eternally One, Good, True, Beautiful and Being Itself.

However, logically, He can take on another nature. After all, he created humans and human nature.

54 posted on 08/02/2014 3:42:05 PM PDT by St_Thomas_Aquinas ( Isaiah 22:22, Matthew 16:19, Revelation 3:7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

To: POWERSBOOTHEFAN; LurkingSince'98

“I am rejecting him completely. NO human can be G-d in the flesh. It is heretical and blasphemous to say that a man can be G-d.”

And that, my FRiend, is why Jesus, Son of God (G-d), died. Because your ancestors refused to ‘recognize’ Him. Jesus was G-d, and became flesh that you and many others could be reconciled to the Father, G-d. The blasphemy is in rejecting Him, Jesus, G-d, Son of G-d, who became flesh to bring you to G-d.

The Pharisee’s knew that Jesus, though in the flesh, was G-d. Once they knew that they sought to kill Him. He was a threat to their power and to their existance.


62 posted on 08/02/2014 8:36:33 PM PDT by GGpaX4DumpedTea (I am a Tea Party descendant...steeped in the Constitutional Republic given to us by the Founders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson