Schumer To Religious Americans: Pick One—Your Faith or Your Business

Cybercast News Service ^ | July 10, 2014 - 4:13 PM | Eric Scheiner

[Olog-hai]

At a press conference Thursday, Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) said people with religious beliefs who disagree with the ObamaCare contraception mandate can choose their faith or “you don’t have to form a corporation.”

“You’re born with a religion or you adopt a religion. You have to obey the precepts of that religion and the government gives you a wide penumbra—you don’t have to form a corporation,” Schumer said.

Schumer claims the Supreme Court’s decision that closely-held firms have a right to deny coverage for certain types of birth control they find objectionable under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) was “misapplied.” …

[ImNotLying]

I got your penumbra right here you Schmuckie Schumer. Your premise should be turned around. Just because I formed a corporation doesn’t mean I lose my Constitutional right to freedom of religion.

[darkangel82]

Except for Obama, no public official has advocated harm to the American people more than Schumer. If we had a justice system he’d be doing some time.

[Gumdrop]

So, religious citizens are now officially assigned to the back of the bus? No participation in the America Dream anymore? All so that people can get free contraceptives? What an immoral stance and unconstitutional attitude.

[PieterCasparzen]

The people of New York should vomit this man out of office.

[Lorianne]

The 1st Amendment doesn’t say you have freedom to excercise your religion ... unless you are an employer.

If they want to change the 1st Amendment to say that, let them go through the proper procedures to do so. Until then, it doesn’t say that.

[Lorianne]

It’s not even about abortion. It’s about shutting down religion altogether.

[Arm_Bears]

Sounds like Schumer is foreshadowing an American Holocaust.

[Flavious_Maximus]

If Christians were to lose their businesses then the government would collapse. It would be the end of the homosexual Chuck Shumer (yes, I know he is married to a woman who looks like a man).

When that day comes (hopefully soon), I will do my part as well.

[RedElement]

Actually, Chuckie, the government doesn’t GIVE us diddly squat regarding a penumbra for religion. The 1st Amendment says the government CAN’T interfere with the free exercise of religion. So, Chuckie, go pound sand.

[I cannot think of a name]

“Sounds like Schumer is foreshadowing an American Holocaust.”

Except the Jews in Germany rather placidly accepted their fate and were largely already disarmed.

We on the other hand......

[bunkerhill7]

“the government gives you a wide penumbra”

It`s a slip of Schumer who speaks for the devil because a penumbra is the gray area between the Light and the Darkness, i.w., between Good and Evil!

I ain`t stupoid y`know., YOU DEMON SCHUMER, AGENT OF SATAN

[Busko]

Another fascist running his suck.

[Amendment10]

Sadly, although the Constitution's simple rules concerning the federal government's limited powers and personal rights are arguably no harder to learn than a child's board game, post-FDR era Harvard Law School-indoctrinated Sen. Schumer is proof that learning the Constitution wrong nonetheless makes it difficult to relearn correctly; I've been there. (I hope that Schumer at least didn’t blow his own money on his Harvard Law School credentials.)

FR: Never Accept the Premise of Your Opponent’s Argument

Regarding Sen. Schumer’s faulty understanding of the constitutionality of the Obamacare Democratcare contraception mandate for example, he doesn’t seem to understand, or blatantly ignores, that the states have never delegated to the feds, expressly via the Constitution, the specific power to regulate, tax and spend for intrastate public healthcare purposes as evidenced by the following excerpts from Supreme Court case opinions.

• ”State inspection laws, health laws, and laws for regulating the internal commerce of a State, and those which respect turnpike roads, ferries, &c. are not within the power granted to Congress. [emphases added]” —Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.

• “Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States.” —Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.

• “Inspection laws, quarantine laws, health laws of every description [emphasis added], as well as laws for regulating the internal commerce of a state and those which respect turnpike roads, ferries, &c., are component parts of this mass.” —Justice Barbour, New York v. Miln, 1837.

• “Direct control of medical practice in the states is obviously [emphasis added] beyond the power of Congress.” –Linder v. United States, 1925.

In fact, constitutional authorities have repeatedly clarified that the Founding States trusted the states, not the federal government, with the care of the people.

• “Our citizens have wisely formed themselves into one nation as to others and several States as among themselves. To the united nation belong our external and mutual relations; to each State, severally, the care of our persons [emphasis added], our property, our reputation and religious freedom.” —Thomas Jefferson: To Rhode Island Assembly, 1801.

• ”Simply this, that the care of the property, the liberty, and the life of the citizen, under the solemn sanction of an oath imposed by your Constitution, is in the States and not in the federal government [emphases added]. I have sought to effect no change in that respect in the Constitution of the country.” —John Bingham, Congressional. Globe. 1866, page 1292 (see top half of third column)

• ”7. Sovereignty, for the protection of the rights of life and personal liberty within the respective States, rests alone with the States [emphases added].” —United States v. Cruikshank, 1875.

Finally, Sen. Schumer's misguided idea that personal rights and business rights are somehow constitutionally mutually exclusive doesn't hold water either. This is evidenced by the fact that the Founding States made the Constitution's Clause 8 of Section 8 of Article I to reward individuals for sharing their intellectual property. More specifically, such individuals are awarded temporary monopoly power in the form of patents and copyrights, monopoly power being an aspect of corporate power, so that inventors and authors can benefit from their ideas. And there's no wording in Clause 8 that requires inventors and authors to give up their 1st Amendment protected freedoms while they enjoy their monopoly power.

As a side note concerning the federal government's constitutionally limited powers, please consider the following. The states would sure be a dull, boring place to grow up and live in if parents were to make sure that their children were taught about the federal government's constitutionally limited powers as the Founding States had intended for those powers to be understood. /sarc

Thomas Jefferson had put it this way:

“Cherish, therefore, the spirit of our people, and keep alive their attention. If once they become inattentive to the public affairs, you and I, and Congress and Assemblies, judges and governors, shall all become wolves. It seems to be the law of our general nature.” - Thomas Jefferson (Letter to Edward Carrington January 16, 1787)

[VerySadAmerican]

It’s hard not to wish bad things to happen to some people.

[ChildOfThe60s]

you are so correct

[ChildOfThe60s]

Chuck Schumer is a particularly dislikable Slug

[hawkboy]

The Mark of the Schmuck

[VRWC For Truth]

Schmuckie is a fascist. Get a rope.

[Some Fat Guy in L.A.]

I love the smell of libtard brains imploding in the morning.

[Olog-hai]

First you can’t own or operate a business, next you can’t buy or sell unless . . . et cetera.