Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: a fool in paradise

There WAS talk of quarantine among the population and in conservative magazines. The talk was, if this were a disease transmissible by air / droplets / casual contact, there would have been, to protect lives. And thousands of gays would have been saved. But instead the politics of the day were such that BECAUSE THE PATIENTS WERE GAY it wouldn’t be PC to do medically sane prevention. That would be “homophobic” so to prevent that horrible optic, more gays, MANY MORE GAYS, and many other victims (transfusion, wives of closeted men, injectable drug users) had to die.

It’s a stupid article. I worked in a blood lab at the time and there was serious talk about quarantining. We even “mini quarantined” the blood samples of AIDS patients and kept them away from the young college students (me included). But Reagan never mentioned it as far as I know. Sensible medical,professionals did.


14 posted on 07/05/2014 10:56:31 AM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Yaelle

The bath/sex houses weren’t even shut down.


20 posted on 07/05/2014 11:07:11 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (The new witchhunt: "Do you NOW, . . . or have you EVER , . . supported traditional marriage?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Yaelle
Re: 14

I think this was the first time in the history of mankind where known carriers of a deadly, communicable disease, were not attempted to be kept isolated from the public.
And quite the opposite, the carriers were treated as virtual heroes and martyrs to their 'cause' of perversion. Billions of dollars raised to fight this disease (which was easily known how to prevent) and siphoned away from working on other diseases such as cancers and Alzheimer's.

27 posted on 07/05/2014 11:24:33 AM PDT by El Cid (Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Yaelle

Patient care providers were not allowed to know whether or not a patient they were working with was infected or not, as that would ‘violate patient privacy’. Instead, ALL patients were to be treated as if they were infected.

That part of the patient record was sealed from all nursing & ancillary staff; only the actual treating physician knew.

Lab draws for HIV testing were even coded to maintain anonymity from staff.

In cases of accidental needle-sticks, or other possible provider exposures, testing & follow up testing was done on the worker only, but the focus was to protect the “privacy” of any infected patient, unlike any other communicable disease. Isolation was out of the question, because it would “unfairly stigmatize” the patient—excuse me; the CLIENT.

It was insanity, and a major factor in my leaving patient care for a desk job.


41 posted on 07/05/2014 12:32:37 PM PDT by ApplegateRanch (Love me, love my guns!©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson