Posted on 07/04/2014 12:27:26 PM PDT by equalator
A California trooper has been filmed brutally beating a woman on the side of a highway - but authorities claimed he simply stopped her for her own safety.
A passing motorist recorded the unidentified California Highway Patrol officer as he punched the woman at least 11 times in the head along the 10 Freeway in Los Angeles on Tuesday.
On the video uploaded to YouTube, the woman can be seen trying to protect herself by putting up her hands but she does not appear to resist the trooper.
'The most animalistic, most brutal way to subdue someone is to pound someone's head into the concrete with really big blows to the head,' witness David Diaz told ABC7
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
Are you now backing away from your 15 closed fists to the face punches?
No.
But you are being stupid.
Please explain why it is necessary to punch someone at all once you have them on the ground.
And if he was trying to cuff her, sitting on her prevents that.
Prevents her from rolling over.
I do so wish you jbt cheerleaders would understand: the cop isn’t automatically right by virtue of wearing a badge.
Hey, more idiocy abounds ping!
Me: Are you now backing away from your 15 closed fists to the face punches?
You: No.
Why? The video clearly shows that there were not 15 closed fists to the face punches.
“You don’t see that because I said so” at this post.
Gotta love it.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3176062/posts?page=325#325
The punches weren’t necessary.
Sorry pal, cheering on bad behavior isn’t a good thing.
You’d have cheered kristalnacht, wouldn’t you.
And once again: once she was on the ground, there was no need to punch her at all.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3176062/posts?page=76#76
And after that, you have commented on the beating.
Even tried to excuse it, claimed it was a rescue!
Funny guy.
I see you woke up another Alaska Wolf clone...
“claimed it was a rescue!”
I stated a fact based on the video.
Fact: in your mind I would be perfectly right to throw you to the ground, sit on you, and punch you in the face supposedly to keep you out of the street.
Okay, good to know!
Yes.
Count is now at four.
“Fact: in your mind I would be perfectly right to throw you to the ground, sit on you, and punch you in the face supposedly to keep you out of the street.”
You ducked the point. -1 point.
No, not ducking.
Pointing out diseased thinking and trying to clarify why you believe it is a rescue.
Facts don’t bear that out.
That was a beating, not a rescue.
Again, of I did that to you to supposedly prevent you from going in the road, you’d be okay with it?
Yes and these sheep think that a beating comes with being “rescued”. It’s a shame she didn’t have a dog. They could have “rescued” it and shot it.
I’d say after the 10th punch or so the middle of the road looked a lot safer to the poor woman. Well if she could see anything except stars at that point.
What ever happened to men not hitting women.
If I did that to my girlfriend, for whatever reason, I’d be going to jail and being a felon for life. Why is it a cop can shoot, hit, beat, tase, berate and just all around act and idiot and if I did THE EXACT SAME THING I would be going to jail? Why is that?
I know I’d have felt safer with the traffic!
As long as the cop had his costume on he’s in the right and the subject is in the wrong.
Or maybe there wasn’t a physician available and he had to get that mandatory blood sample some other way.
Yeh I’d rather dodge cars than some roided up thugs fists.
Yeah, at least cars usually stick to defined lanes.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.