Posted on 06/27/2014 11:48:00 AM PDT by Altariel
We have to accept whatever the cop says.
Thats why I cooperate and don’t argue. Even if I was to see my rights being violated, whats to stop the cop from handcuffing me, throwing me in the back of the car and saying I was being disruptive? Or I was obstructing... or disorderly conduct... any little charge.
Or worse, take out his billystick and say I started to attack him.
If you say something or challenge the cops authority in any way, he gets insulted, makes up a charge like obstruction. Its always good to have video every time, especially when dealing with younger cops who have a billy badass complex.
I can’t help but feel there is a day in cop school now where an instructor says, “If a dog runs in your direction, kill it. If a dog barks at you, kill it. If a dog looks at you funny, kill it. You will never be punished for killing a dog. Period.”
This must be part of the training and understood as SOP in many departments.
Shooting dogs seems to be the desensitization gateway. So you train a LEO to shoot a dog and not feel bad about it so that later you can shoot a ... what ... and not feel bad about it.
The info graphic you posted shows that shooting at vicious dogs works! Since cops are armed (and they do not hesitate to use them), no cop has died at the fangs of the canines. However, here is the static on dogs killing humans in the US:
2013 - 31 unarmed people killed. No cops were killed.
2012 - 35 unarmed people killed. No cops were killed.
2011 - 33 unarmed people killed. No cops were killed.
2010 - 37 unarmed people killed. No cops were killed.
I see the pattern.
Wipe your chin.....your boot polish is smeared.
Being dishonest with the statistics to protect your beloved government employees, are we?
I understand; you have to weep more loudly and flagellate yourself severely in order to show your True Devotion to The State. Throw some more incense on the altar that your prayers may be heard, Comrade!
I see you still have shown no sympathy toward the law-abiding dog’s owner.
If the dog was sitting on the front porch and came towards them, they should also have figured that the guy they were looking for who was armed was NOT there.
“toward the law-abiding dog’s owner.”
Red herring. The dog owner’s law-abiding abilities are not in question.
The dog, however, posed danger to the officer. The dog, being an animal, did not know when to retreat, hence it got shot.
That is not a beagle. I’ve had them many years. No Beagle in that photo.
“Just wait until the anti-cop brigade descends and starts persecuting the cops.”
-
Yep,with their boringly repetitive dumb,dog,and donut jokes.
.
“Wipe your chin.....your boot polish is smeared.”
Sounds like the “boot” is deeply up yours instead.
You stupid asshole.
Do you really think a beagle mix dog is going to kill one of your precious troopers?
This crap is going too far.
Willy Pete
Also what about Utility workers? I spent about 30+ years of my 42, employed years, as a outside utility worker and have yet to have a dog harm or threaten me. My oldest son has 25+ in a similar position and has the same results.
I also have three family members that are in law enforcement and never had a dog come at them or did they shoot any.
Some cops need to change their religion or change jobs!
Go back and reread the article unless you enjoy spouting ignorance.
A hint: “Sheriff’s Deputies came out of the woods onto her front yard, and that’s when they shot her dog four times.
“The first time he tried to run. I don’t think it hit him,” she said. “They still continued to shoot him, and he eventually ran around to the side of my house, died and collapsed by my air conditioner.”
On the other hand, you *could* continue so that the “gods” are not displeased with your failure to chant their praises.
What Yahweh thinks of such blind faith in them is another matter, of course.
The article describes the dog as a “beagle mix”.
The hierarchy remains:
There are four levels to this hierarchy:
A) Police
B) Police Dogs
C) Mundanes
D) Mundanes’ dogs.
Of course, Members of class A may kill members of classes B, C or D without fear of criminal charges, in multiple instances.
Members of classes C or D who kill members of class B are treated as though they killed a member of class A.
Those who faithfully worship Class A will be rewarded in The State to come. Their families will not be grenaded in the Middle of the Night (Unless Class A feels like it), their mentally ill children will not be beaten to death, especially if they are the progeny of Class A (unless, of course, Class A feels like it). Their toddlers will not be burned in their cribs (unless it is necessary for The Good of the State).
< /sarc >
Huh, those false gods don’t offer much of a guarantee to their worshippers, now do they?
You keep trying to use logic. How are the Statists supposed to argue against you, huh? Huh?
*Next* you’ll claim they should have thoroughly searched the child’s home *before* trespassing on someone else’s property.
< / Do I really need a sarc tag? >
The threat in this scenario had two legs, not four.
The Founders were particularly vocal on the subject of two-legged threats to liberty.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.