Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: stevie_d_64

To my knowledge, no law was broken. A drone is no different from a camera in a car driving down the street looking into uncurtained windows


7 posted on 06/24/2014 4:54:47 AM PDT by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 ..... Obama is public enemy #1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: bert

“Google Window”
coming soon. When the Street View just isn’t invasive enough.


8 posted on 06/24/2014 5:09:52 AM PDT by hoosierham (Freedom isn't free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: bert

Yep...That would be hard to even spot from a law enforcement standpoint, much less be a reason to stop and make contact with someone doing that activity...

I believe the perceive threat of unwarranted or unwanted observation by this technology is what has people panties in a wad...And in most cases they would be right to be concerned...

The fact that these guys/gals who were flying this device might have been just flying it around and it happened to get stuck in an area and the appearances of “peeping” (voyeurism is in some areas a crime to a certain degree), is a big concern with the use of this technology...

And, for the record...If you find yourself doing something that you consider to be “private”, or compromising??? Close the shades/blinds!!!

Otherwise, an idea just popped into muh mind, yeah, I know, it happens from time to time...

You know how restaurants put up fishing monofilament line in grids around their outside dining areas??? To ward off bombing runs by birds???

That might be a good idea for private property owners, a static defense mechanism for just such a finite and commercially available technology...

Just shooting from the hip here...


9 posted on 06/24/2014 5:10:29 AM PDT by stevie_d_64 (Will work for a new Kidney...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: bert

The government claims they can use thermal sensors to look through your walls with no privacy violations.

Curtains don’t provide much protection against prying eyes.


11 posted on 06/24/2014 5:16:18 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (The new witchhunt: "Do you NOW, . . . or have you EVER , . . supported traditional marriage?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: bert

I believe that we need pictorial evidence of whether this potential privacy intrusion was lawful or not...


25 posted on 06/24/2014 4:06:35 PM PDT by Delta Dawn (Fluent in two languages: English and cursive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson