Posted on 06/17/2014 5:36:33 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
After an extraordinary start, the World Cup saw its first day of truly mediocre soccer on Monday. It is no coincidence that Monday also saw the debut of the U.S. men's team.
Don't get me wrong. The U.S.'s 2-1 victory over Ghana was about as dramatic as they come, a fitting chapter in what has turned out to be an improbable rivalry stretching over three World Cups. Clint Dempsey scored a fine goal in the first minute, before powering through a broken nose to complete the game. John Brooks came off the bench to score the winning header just moments before the final whistle, lifting the spirit of a team that had been battered like a punching bag for a solid 80 minutes.
But good soccer this was not. The U.S. played about as badly as you could play while still winning. And yet it is impossible to escape the overwhelming sense in the American media today that Team USA's victory over Ghana was somehow a triumph.
Every World Cup we are treated to a slew of stories about how this time the U.S. team will be different, which is to say a step above its usual uninspired play. Driving the hype this time around is the U.S.'s coach, the German Jurgen Klinsmann, a gifted former player famous for his blistering speed, his ultra-competitiveness, and his penchant for soaring when he could merely dive.
Klinsmann promised a more attacking kind of football. As Matthew Futterman wrote in one of the many profiles of Klinsmann in the run-up to the tournament: "Mr. Klinsmann taught the U.S. players to see the field differently — to impose themselves on opposing defenses, and for defenders to push high into the middle of the field and even to join the attack." As Klinsmann himself said, "You want to play an open game. You want to put your stamp on the game."
Sounds good, right? And so it was with some curiosity that I tuned in last night for my quadrennial viewing of the United States team — only to find the same dull, flabby soccer that has defined America's playing style for decades.
For most of the game, the U.S. was seemingly incapable of stringing together more than three passes at a time. Michael Bradley, supposedly the linchpin of the midfield, gave the ball away every other touch. It's bad enough that the U.S.'s sole striker is Jozy Altidore, who scored all of one goal last season for his club Sunderland, but he pulled up with a hamstring injury early in the game, leaving the U.S. with literally zero offensive options.
Then there's the defense, which was as adept at keeping its shape as a Jenga tower, falling apart at the slightest offensive push by the Ghanians. John Brooks may have turned out to be a hero, but the Ghanians appeared to be running at him as if he were the weakest link in an already fragile defensive chain. More shockingly, the Black Stars won the vast majority of 50-50 balls, easily out-muscling and out-hustling an American team that should at least be as fit as its opponents.
But all these glaring flaws were largely glossed over in the glow of victory. The U.S. defense was an "impenetrable force field," according to The New York Times. USA Today praised the team's "depth" and "workmanlike defense." CBS hailed Team USA for "bossing a match when it mattered most," and for "finding a way to be economical and resourceful and cunning and alert when all is on the line against an elite opponent."
Oh, please. This is shameless propaganda. It all fits the same pattern: ridiculous overpraise that is in no way connected to the reality on the pitch, fueling outsized expectations that cannot possibly be met. Klinsmann may want to institute a regime of lively, attacking soccer, but that seems like a pure fantasy when you take into account the players on his squad.
Now, of course, the national press is bound to overstate the national team's achievements. This happens everywhere. It is World Cup mania, after all. But in case there was any doubt about the truth of the matter, it is this: the American team is not very good.
USA Soccer—”Europeanizing” the US since 1913.
We did get pretty beat up by Ghana, and we escaped because they didn’t have people who could finish chances. They outhustled us and beat us to almost every loose ball, however they had also a very porous defense that allowed us to score 2 goals out of maybe 3 chances we had all game. All in all, we may just need to tie Portugal and not get too embarrassed by Germany to move out of the group (assuming Germany beats Ghana).
It seems like we lack in many areas: ball comtrol, passing, tackling, and passing.
Soccer is part of a Satanic/Communist conspiracy and has something to do with the LGBT demonic movement. I haven’t worked out the details yet though.
Great quote. And I guarantee if Patton were alive today, if he saw a group of Americans playing for the world championship of ANYTHING, he damn well would be rooting for them to win, and not acting a like a prick toward his fellow (conservative) Amercians.
True, but don’t be confused that “champions” are the best team. They just happen to perform at the right moment(s).
Sorry FRiend, but I wouldn’t date a Raven’s fan if they were the last person on earth.
Another thing I dug about it was these guys must be TREMENDOUS athletes. Not only flat out stamina but doing it in brutal heat and humidity. When I consider that I guess it isn’t so bad the ball goes out of bounds or whatever its called all the time, it’s brutal enough. If they were just doodling around the very short stoppages would be annoying. Like a batter stepping out and fiddling with his dumb batting gloves even when he didn’t swing.
Freegards
Hopefully Klinsi will be coaching Bradley up for this game. We need him at his best.
If you get really good at soccer, the world will switch to rugby or maybe cricket, anything that you don’t play.
They just wouldn’t be able to handle being whipped by the U.S.A. at soccer on a regular basis.
So if you want to get rid of soccer, get good at it.
Not sure how the NFL got into this, but trust me, no Ravens fan would want to be seen with an “alternate lifestyler” like you.
Sheldon: I grew up in Texas. Football is ubiquitous in Texas. Pro football, college football, high school football, peewee football, in fact, every form of football except the original, European football, which most Texans believe to be a Commie plot.
You take soccer much too seriously.
Of course I’m a Howard fan, but I too thought, most times, he makes that save, he got caught leaning the wrong way, and also I think he should have come out further to challenge the shot.
Remember: don’t do anything. Just be a good little fan slave, and watch TV.
Chinese Man Dies From Sleep Deprivation After Staying Up Late to Watch the World Cup
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3169086/posts
You do know Clint Dempsey is a Texan, right?
Patton would hate soccer too. Notice he did not mention it in his quote, even though soccer has existed in the U.S. since 1913. Obviously, he did not think of it as worth mentioning.
Face. The. Facts.
I think Howard had a good game. He did make one mistake that I saw. (If you can call leaning the wrong way a mistake).
That one ball he tipped, even though in the end it would have been wide, was insane.
He didn’t mention equestrian, either. Should I give it up? He didn’t.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.