Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Navy divers to visit wreck of USS Houston in Indonesia
Fox News ^ | 6/9/2014

Posted on 06/14/2014 12:36:48 PM PDT by llevrok

Divers from the U.S. Navy will visit the World War II graveyard of the "Galloping Ghost of the Java Coast” — the sunken USS Houston — later this month in a bid to determine what remains of the ship, which went down with more than 700 sailors off the coast of Indonesia.

The wreck of the Northampton-class heavy cruiser, which was sunk by the Japanese during the World War II battle of Sunda Strait on Feb. 28, 1942, will be surveyed by Navy divers working with their counterparts from Indonesia. The ship lies about 125 feet deep, near Java, Indonesia, where it has become a popular dive site for scavengers. Navy officials now want to find out what's left of the sacred site, especially given that it rests in corrosive waters in an unstable region.

(snip)

The mighty, 570-foot ship was sailing at night with the Australian ship HMAS Perth when they ran into the Japanese destroyer Fubukim, which quietly shadowed them for the next half hour before the encounter culminated in what became known as the Battle of Sunda Strait. Houston scored hits on the Japanese ship Mikuma, then managed to elude a torpedo barrage from Fubukim. But other Japanese destroyers engaged the two Allies' ships, first sinking Perth and then sending Houston to the bottom just after midnight.

Of the crew of 1,061, some 368 survived, including 24 of the 74-man USMC detachment aboard. The crew became prisoners of the Japanese for the remainder of the war, with dozens dying at the hands of their Japanese captors.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: History; Military/Veterans
KEYWORDS: fdr; indonesia; japan; navy; usnavy; usshouston; worldwareleven; ww2
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: Patton@Bastogne

Thanks for mentioning “Neptune’s Inferno”. I’ve read the previous two books by this author and liked them. I am now looking forward to “Inferno”

-llevrok


21 posted on 06/14/2014 3:59:24 PM PDT by llevrok (Straight. Since 1950.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: bandleader
The US Navy IGNORED her

Note that they did not ignore the captain upon his rescue and return to the States. Sick War Dept.bastards court martialed him for their F up. So considerate.

22 posted on 06/14/2014 4:06:35 PM PDT by llevrok (Straight. Since 1950.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

The captain of the Japanese sub that sunk the Indy was brought in to testify at the court martial. That made me sick to hear many decades later. That had to have a role in his eventual suicide.


23 posted on 06/14/2014 6:10:39 PM PDT by NCC-1701 (I am proud of what America USED TO BE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: buwaya

I don’t think they were making an attack as such the Houston and the Perth, along with a Dutch destroyer were all that remained of the Allied navy and they were making a run around the west Java coast down through the Sunda Strait (site of the Krakatoa volcano) from Batavia (Jakarta) to Australia.

They simply had the misfortune to run slap bang into the main Japanese invading force which annihilated them.


24 posted on 06/14/2014 6:18:23 PM PDT by PotatoHeadMick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

The Japanese Navy’s tactics were superb using searchlights and torpedoes they wiped out the three Allied vessels without the Allies laying a glove on them.

All the ships sunk in the action were sunk by the Japanese including the accidental sinking of a Japanese troop carrier. I believe later that the captain of the destroyer who sank the troopship came to the troopship’s captain to apologise for his error, understandable in the heat of battle, the trooper’s captain silenced him and told him that he would prefer to allow the Houston to have the honour of the sinking.


25 posted on 06/14/2014 6:22:48 PM PDT by PotatoHeadMick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

It was a combination of tactics and training. Prior to Pearl Harbor and during the early days of the war, many of our ships were crewed by recent conscripts—that’s one reason that Admiral Kimmel’s predecessor as CINCPAC, Admiral J.O. Richardson fought with FDR to move the bulk of the fleet back to San Diego. He knew we needed time to train, and we would lose a lot of engagements until the training gap was closed.

Of course, we did have a few things going for us. Commanders like Halsey and Ray Spruance were first-rate; our aircrews developed tactics to lessen the Zero’s advantage until the F6F Hellcat became available, and Japan simply couldn’t match our advantage in war production.

Still, we paid a heavy price until the tide began to turn. The naval campaign that accompanied the invasion of Guadalcanal is a case in point. The first naval battle of Guadalcanal was a tactical disaster; the Admiral leading our forces, Daniel Callaghan, had ships with the latest radar, but put them in the back of the formation. He never issued a battle plan and had difficulty recognizing what the Japanese were doing and issuing orders to his command.

With IJN forces (under Admiral Abe) split into multiple columns, portions of the U.S. force found themselves caught between two Japanese elements. At one point, Callaghan issued the order, “Odd ships fire to starboard, even ships to port.” With the lack of pre-engagement planning, no one could discern which ships in the chaos were “odd” or “even.”

Admiral Callaghan was killed during the engagement (along with much of his staff) when a shell struck his flagship, the USS San Francisco. Command (literally) passed to a Lieutenant Commander named Bruce McCandless, who, along with the captain of the USS Helena, managed to lead the decimated U.S. formation through the rest of the battle.

Incidentally, Callaghan’s assignment before arriving in the Pacific was as naval aide to President Roosevelt, a job he got on the recommendation of the commander-in-chief’s military physician. Callaghan was a brave man who gave his life for his country, but you can argue he was the wrong man for leading our forces in that epic battle.

I’ve heard the Callaghan was commander because he had one month seniority over Admiral Norman Scott, who had more combat experience and also died in the battle.


26 posted on 06/14/2014 6:59:08 PM PDT by ExNewsExSpook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

Yes, I have seen that one also.


27 posted on 06/15/2014 3:25:17 PM PDT by GrouchoTex (...and ye shall know the Truth and the Truth shall set you free....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Patton@Bastogne

long lance torpedoes were excellent offensive but this came at a cost. the propellant was more explosive than USN torpedoes so main gun hits in the torpedo bays of an IJN cruiser would cause larger secondary explosions and considerable more damage.


28 posted on 07/15/2014 10:31:28 AM PDT by bravo whiskey (we shouldn't fear the government. the government should fear us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson