You sound like a liberal throwing the race card around, while you pretend to not understand what the word EXCLUSIVE means.
What does John 1:12 mean to you?
Do you not think that being an adopted son of the Creator of the Universe is not exclusive?
Do you not believe what Jesus said in John 14:6? Osteen doesn’t, Warren doesn’t, Oprah doesn’t, and I’ve heard a few “SBC folks” say they don’t either over the years. It’s just not “inclusive enough”....
The article discussed RACIAL diversity. It had nothing to do with rejecting the need to repent and believe, nor was it suggesting that the SBC was looking to accommodate sinful behavior.
I haven’t thrown anything. I’ve simply inquired about what you’re throwing. You complain about the Baptists being too diverse racially, then you complain about God being too exclusive, to the detriment of those who reject Him. You accuse Baptists of embracing homosexual behavior, based on the fact that they won’t elect a homosexual president. What you say makes no sense, and when you’re asked about it, instead of clearing up what you meant to say, you call names.
When I first asked you about your off the wall remark, I genuinely wanted to know. I thought you might have a rational explanation, and I wanted to read it. Now, I realize you just hate Baptists, and will say whatever random thought comes into your head to help you express that. And I’m no longer curious about what you meant to say. It couldn’t possibly have been important or interesting.