Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Plus-Size Models Reimagine the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Issue Cover
Yahoo Shine ^ | 06/03/2014 | By Lilit Marcus

Posted on 06/03/2014 10:09:52 AM PDT by Carbonsteel

Eariler this year, models Nina Agdal, Lily Aldridge, and Chrissy Teigen went topless for the cover of the Sports Illustrated swimsuit issue. But when three plus-size models, including supermodel Robyn Lawley, did a tongue-in-cheek recreation of the photo, it wasn't a satire – it was a way to show how women of all sizes can be sexy and confident in swimwear.

(Excerpt) Read more at shine.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: beauty; chubbychasers; doublestandard; feminism; obesity; sportsillustrated
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last
To: SeaHawkFan

She wasn’t smaller than average..she was average..today..where girls get boob jobs for a HS graduation present..our senses have become conditioned to inflated bosoms..


21 posted on 06/03/2014 10:28:30 AM PDT by ken5050 ("One useless man is a shame, two are a law firm, three or more are a Congress".. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
Marilyn Monroe was 5'5", 115lbs, 35-22-35. Nina Agdal, one of the SI swimsuit cover models this year is 5/9", 121lbs, 34-23-35. They are effectively the same proportions, except that Agdal is 7% taller and 6% heavier.

Those actually are not the same proportions when height and weight increase by the same ratio. To take an extreme, think about a 6' tall man at 200 pounds, and a 3' tall child at 100 pounds. The adult may be reasonably proportioned, while the child is severely obese. The correct proportionate weight for Nida Agdal to match Marilyn Monroe's shape would be roughly 138 pounds at 5' 9" tall (1.0615^3 * 115 . . . actually not quite true for technical reasons; 134 pounds is a better match, but in either case, Nina is proportionately significantly slimmer).

22 posted on 06/03/2014 10:35:19 AM PDT by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

weight should increase by the square of the height. If they were proportional, the taller model should weight about 132 pounds.


23 posted on 06/03/2014 10:35:36 AM PDT by dangerdoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: shotgun

When baby got back, baby gots to wear granny panties.

Pass


24 posted on 06/03/2014 10:35:47 AM PDT by definitelynotaliberal (Go, Cruz! Go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: dangerdoc

Maybe weight should increase proportional to the cube? No time to think about it now.


25 posted on 06/03/2014 10:36:44 AM PDT by dangerdoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: SeaHawkFan; ken5050
MM was of average height, with a below average waist and an above average bust.

Think of it like this: a bust to waist ratio of 35:22 is 1.6, vs. the average ratio which was 33:24.5 or 1.35.

That's a 20% variance in the ratio which, to a normal male observer is . . . eye-catching.

26 posted on 06/03/2014 10:36:59 AM PDT by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Carbonsteel

Ladies, you are not “curvy”. The Sports Illustrated models are curvy. The Victories Secret models are curvy. You are fat.


27 posted on 06/03/2014 10:38:44 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carbonsteel
Helen Mirren, age 22, in 1967:

http://www.metacafe.com/watch/yt-MQh1G8yrfqg/helen_mirren_in_herostratus_1967/

A bit of fat on a woman is normal, healthy, and highly attractive.

28 posted on 06/03/2014 10:40:08 AM PDT by katana (Just my opinions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Snickering Hound

Perfection! Aaaah!


29 posted on 06/03/2014 10:40:45 AM PDT by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle

Jessica Biel! Heh


30 posted on 06/03/2014 10:42:21 AM PDT by Bulwyf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625

True. Even with the rolls and ripples photoshopped out, they are still just just overweight.


31 posted on 06/03/2014 10:42:43 AM PDT by definitelynotaliberal (Go, Cruz! Go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625

When they are that skinny, their curves come from a surgeon and a good photoshop artist.


32 posted on 06/03/2014 10:42:53 AM PDT by dangerdoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1; dangerdoc
These are fair points.

These are nothing if not three dimensional calculations.

The variable here is the bust, for which MM was proportionately larger.

If Agdal had that, she would still probably be 7lbs or so underweight compared to MM.

33 posted on 06/03/2014 10:44:34 AM PDT by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Snickering Hound

Beats counting sheep by a mile!


34 posted on 06/03/2014 10:45:57 AM PDT by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: katana; All
Well worth watching....to make it easier..here's a direct link

On the same topic..if you can find a copy of "Boccaccio 70" the scene with Anita Ekberg is juts plain awesome...

35 posted on 06/03/2014 10:46:06 AM PDT by ken5050 ("One useless man is a shame, two are a law firm, three or more are a Congress".. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: katana
Excellent.

Lookin' pretty good in 2014 too


36 posted on 06/03/2014 10:46:17 AM PDT by nascarnation (Toxic Baraq Syndrome: hopefully infecting a Dem candidate near you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: SeaHawkFan

I agree. I am all for fat shaming.


37 posted on 06/03/2014 10:46:38 AM PDT by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sam Gamgee
Yes, very sad. So called plus size models are what women looked like and were cherished 50 years ago. Marilyn Monroe would be plus sized by our standards. Non-plus models are essentially flag poles.

No, when they talk about "plus size", these days, THIS is what they mean:

These women are clinically obese.

38 posted on 06/03/2014 10:46:59 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Carbonsteel

I agree. A size 12 is considered plus size and that is the average size of most women.


39 posted on 06/03/2014 10:48:13 AM PDT by CityCenter (Resist Obamacare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangerdoc
Maybe weight should increase proportional to the cube?

the square of the root is inversely proportional to the angle of the dangle ...

40 posted on 06/03/2014 10:48:42 AM PDT by bankwalker (In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson