Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DannyTN

>>And the dogma and “just so” stories that comes out of evolutionist camps is another major embarrassment to real scientists.<<

If you can scientifically refute evolution, you will be the first to ever do so.

I can nail AGW using the Scientific Method with my little finger (scientific alternative addresses all know facts — the Earth has undergone broad climate changes which include changes of No2 since its birth).

If you have a physical scientific (not theological/philosophical) alternative that explains the billions of data points that cross multiple disciplines (physics/geology/cosmology/archaeology) let’s see it. The world will be your oyster.


33 posted on 06/02/2014 2:09:11 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (AGW "Scientific method:" Draw your lines first, then plot your points)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: freedumb2003
It should be easier to refute global warming than evolution, yet you can no more convince the consensus your little finger not withstanding, than I can convince the consensus about evolution.

Many have refuted macroevolution but the scientific consensus just shrugs and says okay maybe we were wrong on that individual point but the theory must still be true. The list of evolutionist claims that have been proved false is extremely long. Thus evolution is not falsifiable. Evolution is a belief system. It's dogma.

9 scientific facts that prove the theory of evolution is false

37 posted on 06/02/2014 3:34:16 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson