Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Jim from C-Town

Jackson is on record as having said that nonTolkien fans would have found Bombadil confusing and it wasn’t essential to the story, as much as we would have wanted to see it.

I can agree that it would have been very confusing and distracting, because the Hobbits were on the run for their lives against ever-present danger, but they could stay with, Bombadil practically forever, not to mention that this ring supposedly got everybody it touch addicted to wanting oower, but to him it had about as much hold on him as a cheap trinket would have on you or I?


30 posted on 05/22/2014 6:04:54 PM PDT by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: Jonty30
I can agree that it would have been very confusing and distracting, because the Hobbits were on the run for their lives against ever-present danger, but they could stay with, Bombadil practically forever, not to mention that this ring supposedly got everybody it touch addicted to wanting oower, but to him it had about as much hold on him as a cheap trinket would have on you or I?

In the story Tom had immense power, but was not interested in exercising it or exerting it outside his little patch of Middle Earth.

The implication is that he is some sort of Maia or something similar who has been there since Arda was created.

While the Nazgul and presumably Sauron's armies couldn't overpower him, if Sauron himself came, Tom would be destroyed.

More critically, Tom couldn't be trusted to keep the Ring safe because that's not the way his mind worked. He'd lose it or give it away without thinking about it.

He just was not a serious or responsible person.

Here's a quote from JRRT on his character: " The story is cast in terms of a good side, and a bad side, beauty against ruthless ugliness, tyranny against kingship, moderated freedom with consent against compulsion that has long lost any object save mere power, and so on; but both sides in some degree, conservative or destructive, want a measure of control. But if you have, as it were, taken 'a vow of poverty', renounced control, and take your delight in things for themselves without reference to yourself, watching, observing, and to some extent knowing, then the questions of the rights and wrongs of power and control might become utterly meaningless to you, and the means of power quite valueless..."

48 posted on 05/22/2014 7:59:38 PM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: Jonty30

Well, at least Jackson could have had a character ride through the scene on a unicycle with an umbrella singing

Oh I’m a lucky fella,
I’m a lucky boy,
I’ve got a new umbrella,
And it’s me pride and joy!

And the rain may come
And the sun may go
I’ll be warm ‘n’ dry
From me head to toe

Oh I’m a lucky fella
I’m a lucky boy!


64 posted on 05/23/2014 6:11:08 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson