Skip to comments.
Man suing almost everyone for all the money on Earth
New York Post ^
| May 16, 2014 | 7:41pm
| Rich Calder
Posted on 05/17/2014 9:45:29 PM PDT by Olog-hai
This lawsuit is priceless!
A Manhattan man has sued the city, NYC Transit, Au Bon Pain Store, two local hospitals, Kmart, a Latina dog owner and anyone else he could think offor two undecillion dollars.
Anton Purisima, 62, filed the hand-scribbled lawsuit in Manhattan federal court seeking more money than whats on the planetand, in turn, likely setting a new record for a lawsuit money demand.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Local News; Miscellaneous; Weird Stuff
KEYWORDS: thinkbig
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
Written longhand, $2 undecillion = $2,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00.
1
posted on
05/17/2014 9:45:29 PM PDT
by
Olog-hai
To: Olog-hai
Did he spill a coffee on his lap?
2
posted on
05/17/2014 9:48:02 PM PDT
by
MaxMax
(Pay Attention and you'll be pissed off too! FIRE BOEHNER, NOW!)
To: Olog-hai
First thought I had after reading the article, “He must be a democrat”.
3
posted on
05/17/2014 9:49:13 PM PDT
by
Mastador1
(I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
To: Olog-hai
All Right!!
If it works for him, I'm def gonna copy his lawsuit!!
4
posted on
05/17/2014 9:51:01 PM PDT
by
HeartlandOfAmerica
(An army of deer led by a lion is more to be feared than an army of lions, led by a deer.)
To: Olog-hai
Check. $2x1036, or a mere $2 trillion trillion trillion ... piker!
5
posted on
05/17/2014 10:02:38 PM PDT
by
dr_lew
To: Olog-hai
Start high and bargain down!
6
posted on
05/17/2014 10:04:19 PM PDT
by
TigersEye
("No man left behind" is more than an Army Ranger credo it's the character of America.)
To: HeartlandOfAmerica
It would be a lot less work, because you’ll have only him to sue.
7
posted on
05/17/2014 10:05:09 PM PDT
by
Southside_Chicago_Republican
(If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.)
To: Olog-hai
a Latina dog owner ?
How about a dog owner? What is next..a Fat dog owner, a gay dog owner. sheesh
To: Southside_Chicago_Republican
To: Patriot Babe
White Hispanic dog owner..?
10
posted on
05/17/2014 10:22:26 PM PDT
by
DanielRedfoot
(Creepy Ass Cracker)
To: Olog-hai
He’s justified in demanding money from me that he hasn’t work for. It’s called Civil Service.
There is nothing civil about theft unless you are on the receiving end.
11
posted on
05/17/2014 10:26:22 PM PDT
by
glyptol
To: Patriot Babe
Here's the latina dog
12
posted on
05/17/2014 10:34:20 PM PDT
by
mountn man
(The Pleasure You Get From Life Is Equal To The Attitude You Put Into It)
To: Olog-hai
I was told by someone who had experience with courts that Federal judges especially frown on frivolous lawsuits. If that’s true, this guy could find himself charged with contempt of court.
To: Patriot Babe
Actually, it should be Latino dog owner. Who knew that was an occupation?
14
posted on
05/17/2014 11:28:43 PM PDT
by
skr
(May God confound the enemy)
To: Olog-hai
How about he just gets two raspberries and a huge thumbs down instead?
15
posted on
05/17/2014 11:39:31 PM PDT
by
Bullish
(You ever notice that liberalism really just amounts to anti-morality?)
To: Olog-hai
Suing for more than exists
Lol
16
posted on
05/18/2014 12:05:04 AM PDT
by
GeronL
(Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans!)
To: Olog-hai
Too bad it won’t make it far enough to be laughed out of court.
17
posted on
05/18/2014 12:14:29 AM PDT
by
Safrguns
(PM me if you like to play Minecraft!)
To: MaxMax
Sounds like Obama’s budget proposal.
To: TigersEye
Start high and bargain down!Maybe he will settle for $3.95. Then the judge will throw that out too. F that MoFo.
19
posted on
05/18/2014 2:41:43 AM PDT
by
Mark17
(Chicago Blackhawks: Stanley Cup champions 2010, 2013. Vietnam Vet 70-71 Msgt US Air Force, retired)
To: Olog-hai
This country definitely needs to adopt a loser pay system for frivolous suits. Right now, if a defendant loses - he pays. Even if a defendant wins, he still has what may be crippling legal costs. The plaintiff, on the other hand generally stands to either win, or at worst, remains in control of when to cut his losses in terms of legal costs. The biggest losers in the present system may well be those who have legitimate suits who are told to take a number in a clogged system.
The plaintiffs need some, "skin in the game," and need to be held to account in terms of defendant legal bills, court costs, etc. if their suit is found to be frivolous.
20
posted on
05/18/2014 3:04:37 AM PDT
by
Joe 6-pack
(Qui me amat, amat et canem meum.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson