Your nonsensical analogy is silly, and repeating a logical fallacy that's been known since the Greeks doesn't improve your point; it just makes you look more and more desperate because you persist in repeating something stupid.
Your prodigious pasting of a report based on psychoanalysis is just more repetition of lunacy I have already demolished twice.
In my original post I told you why the wartime analysis of Hitler was not serious: because it was psychoanalytic and psychoanalysis is as valid as shamanism, Tarot, or astrology.
Do I deny that they came to the correct conclusion with regards to his suicide? No, and so what? Had the Germans made it to Moscow Stalin would have done the same. Does that prove the Freudians reached anything other than a purely fortuitous conclusion? Nope. Does it prove Stalin was a homosexual? Nope.
By all means, keep posting. Every moment you waste with me is at least a moment you aren't spreading your silly ideas on some other thread.
Your nonsensical analogy is silly, and repeating a logical fallacy that's been known since the Greeks doesn't improve your point; it just makes you look more and more desperate because you persist in repeating something stupid.
Since you are the one who has been consistently unable to refrain from personal insults, I'd say it is you that is desperate. You refuse to consider circumstantial evidence of Hitler's deviant sexuality and state that direct incontrovertible proof is the only permissible standard. Therefore, using your standard of proof, do you believe Al Capone was not a murderer?
Your prodigious pasting of a report based on psychoanalysis is just more repetition of lunacy I have already demolished twice.
I really don't care much about any form of psychobabble. What I care about is the available information about Hitler that was compiled by the U.S. Government. That to me is a puzzle that is missing some pieces. Whether Langer used psychoanalysis, or whatever your shrinks use to fill in the missing pieces is not particularly important to me. I can form my own opinion from the available evidence.
In my original post I told you why the wartime analysis of Hitler was not serious: because it was psychoanalytic and psychoanalysis is as valid as shamanism, Tarot, or astrology.
As I just said, I don't care one way or the other about psychobabble. I'm interested in the body of information that was compiled about Hitler as input to the report. I can read and form my own opinion about it.
Do I deny that they came to the correct conclusion with regards to his suicide? No, and so what? Had the Germans made it to Moscow Stalin would have done the same
Since you require direct incontrovertible evidence concerning Hitler's sexuality, what similar proof can you offer that Stalin would have committed suicide? We both know the answer to that, none.
Does that prove the Freudians reached anything other than a purely fortuitous conclusion? Nope. Does it prove Stalin was a homosexual? Nope.
There you go again, moving goalposts and creating distractions.
By all means, keep posting. Every moment you waste with me is at least a moment you aren't spreading your silly ideas on some other thread.
Fine with me.