[House Atreides]

What I don’t understand is how these judges can forever get away with saying Voter ID is unconstitutional when the Supreme Court has already said that it is NOT unconstitutional. Even the progressive judges believe they are our overlords and are above the law.

[wrench]

Not just precinct hopping, but massive early voter and absentee voter fraud.

[bigbob]

you could give them 20 years and it’d still be rassist /s

[Fester Chugabrew]

Another way to deal with this is via all-natural, un-washable, purple dye to be applied on the left thumb of everyone who votes in a given election . . . if they do not have a photo ID. That, and people with integrity to monitor the process.

[BenLurkin]

What kind of person doesn’t have a photo ID?

Should such a person be voting?

[BitWielder1]

If a person can't obtain a photo id and get registered to vote then he probably should not be voting.
We don't want foreign tourists voting, do we?
An ID is to make sure you are who you say you are, that you are eligible, that you vote were you are supposed to and then only once.
What's so racist about that?
It's to cut down on voter fraud. Democrats support voter fraud. It's abundantly clear why.

Barring Voter ID, I think the purple dye for anyone who can't produce an ID is a great idea.
If that's racist, then I'll gladly dip my finger in the ink too.
To show solidarity with the disenfranchised as well as legal voters whose votes will now at least have parity with ... somewhat less verifiable votes.

[JimRed]

How busy can minorities be being they can't find the time to request a proper ID?

Progressive response if on truth serum: "Oh, they're not too busy; they're just not smart enough".