Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/12/2014 7:01:26 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
To: BenLurkin
“multi-proxy climate reconstructions”

I have the text of the computer simulation right here:

print "It's Global Warming!"

2 posted on 04/12/2014 7:04:48 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Yeah, we know just like the world food shortage, Peak oil and acid rain. And what all else. Socialism masquerading as environmentalism.


3 posted on 04/12/2014 7:05:21 PM PDT by amnestynone (Lindsey Graham is a feckless, duplicitous, treacherous, double dealing backstabbing corksucker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Dangit, not another headache. Oh well, back to FR.


4 posted on 04/12/2014 7:06:40 PM PDT by Delta Dawn (Fluent in two languages: English and cursive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Somebody been hittin’ da happy smoke.


5 posted on 04/12/2014 7:13:29 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Obama's smidgens are coming home to roost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Anthony Watts has a summary of this paper, a link to a rebuttal, and some choice comments over at Watts up with that:
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2014/04/11/claim-odds-that-global-warming-is-due-to-natural-factors-slim-to-none/


6 posted on 04/12/2014 7:20:07 PM PDT by norwaypinesavage (for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Odds that the globe is warming significantly: slim to none.


7 posted on 04/12/2014 7:21:20 PM PDT by beethovenfan (If Islam is the solution, the "problem" must be freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

There are an astounding number of factors that they deliberately ignore, I don’t know how they can take themselves seriously.

Don’t tell them that another 5% closer to the sun and we’ll be out of the habitable zone. They’ll be looking for ways to move the earth away.


8 posted on 04/12/2014 7:21:40 PM PDT by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

You know summer is coming when climate change becomes global warming.


10 posted on 04/12/2014 7:25:44 PM PDT by 867V309 (Obammy = LIAR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

What caused the Ice Age? Why did the ice later melt?


11 posted on 04/12/2014 7:27:48 PM PDT by FatherofFive (Islam is evil and must be eradicated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

ANYTHING that The Mann has touched is totally bogus.


12 posted on 04/12/2014 7:33:14 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Oh it must be right because NEVER before in all of recorded history have we experienced global warming or cooling...That mini ice age in the 1700s was all made up and imaginary. Only now are we lucky enough to have one such as Al Gore to tell us the truth.

Was that snarky enough?


13 posted on 04/12/2014 7:34:16 PM PDT by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin
McGill didn't,by any chance,explain how “Greenland” got its name,did they?
14 posted on 04/12/2014 7:34:50 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Stalin Blamed The Kulaks,Obama Blames The Tea Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

So how did the Medieval and Roman warming periods happen?


16 posted on 04/12/2014 7:42:43 PM PDT by Hugin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

now I could be wrong, but I’m fairly certain all the global warminig comes from the sun and last i checked, the sun is considered ‘natural’

of course, the flaming libtards know better... via their drug induced haze... so maybe they should babble on some more

oh, I’ll never endorse ANY money for their ‘research’ but they’re more then welcome to babble away


18 posted on 04/12/2014 7:44:08 PM PDT by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

George Bush caused it. He did it in Texas with a fracking...thing


19 posted on 04/12/2014 7:45:29 PM PDT by bigbob (The best way to get a bad law repealed is to enforce it strictly. Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin
To assess the natural variability before much human interference, the new study uses “multi-proxy climate reconstructions” developed by scientists in recent years to estimate historical temperatures, as well as fluctuation-analysis techniques from nonlinear geophysics. The climate reconstructions take into account a variety of gauges found in nature, such as tree rings, ice cores, and lake sediments. And the fluctuation-analysis techniques make it possible to understand the temperature variations over wide ranges of time scales.

Pseudo-science Psychobabble BS.
Translation : We got a new computer simulation, and no, you can't get the coding for it.

That's private.

Uh huh.
Same old BS.
New set of perps.

22 posted on 04/12/2014 7:59:55 PM PDT by publius911 ( At least Nixon had the good g race to resign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin
The key fallacy is the concept of 'natural variability.' That term does not mean the same thing as 'due to a natural cause.' The use of that term is an intentional attempt to deceive, because they know most people will think that a showing that "natural variability" is unlikely means that a natural (non-human) cause is therefore likely. But that is simply not true.

The term 'natural variability' refers to random fluctuations in the climate. But it leaves out non-random causes of climate change, such as the Sun, changes in volcanic activity, changes in cosmic ray density, changes in the orbit of the Earth around the Sun, and other possible causes--some of which we may in fact not even realize could be contributing factors, including human activity having nothing to do with emissions of carbon dioxide.

The Null Hypothesis with respect to AGW is not that climate change is due mostly to 'natural variability,' it is that that climate change is mostly due to natural factors of any sort, whether those are random variations/fluctuations or are something else. And the Null Hypothesis has not been disproven. Had it been, the peer-reviewed paper or papers which presented such disproof would be the most cited paper(s) in all of climate science (and perhaps in all of science for the last many decades.)

25 posted on 04/12/2014 8:37:06 PM PDT by sourcery (Valid rights must be perfectly reciprocal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

GLOBALONEY BULLSHIT is what it is!


26 posted on 04/12/2014 8:43:28 PM PDT by Taxman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

“According to new studies” there never was a warm period such as led to the extinction of dinosaurs. Dinosaurs are still around, just look at Democrats in politics.


28 posted on 04/12/2014 8:52:14 PM PDT by Rembrandt (Part of the 51% who pay Federal taxes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

That right there warms my global.


29 posted on 04/12/2014 9:12:39 PM PDT by VerySadAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson