No - I was replying to Holden about why I questioned the logical extension of your theories. I know YOU don’t know any answers because everything you write is circumstantial conjecture - I was asking Holden why replying to your questions was considered without the scope of FR rules. As far as I am aware when someone asks a question, you are entitled to answer as long as you are on topic and not offensive. I am also confused by holden’s reference to my politics - since I am non-political and have made no political comment here or anywhere else for that matter, I find that curious and rather paranoid.
But since you have answered - you hypothesise that around 400 people are involved in this cover-up by the time you include the funeral - surely you know when and how even one of them was approached by the regime and bribed to keep quiet - and if not, where is your evidence any of them were. Are you willing to admit you have none and it is all guesswork? Or ae you the only one permitted to ask questions.
Incidentally, what DID you see?
You butcher everything that is said. I have clearly said that nobody at the funeral had to know a thing. It was kitv that photoshopped the funeral clips.
Your politics is clear by the epistemology you reveal in every comment you make. There’s a certain smell that you fogbowers carry with you wherever you go; you don’t smell it but everybody else does.
Responding to comments is not forbidden here, and I don’t believe Holden said anything about your posting being against the rules. What he said, IIRC, was that your input always seems intent on maligning me. And I would say that is correct, since the actual CONTENT you post has been addressed many times by me and others (for instance, a simpler plan of handling Fuddy would be too obvious as foul play). And he suggested that maybe DU would be more your speed.
I responded to your post because you asked a good question. And I asked whether you had posted to me without pinging me because your post suggested that this last question was one you were asking me about, and I had never seen it.
Jim, cousteausghost has asked me what I see in the video. Am I OK to tell him?
If you don't want to be instantly, automatically or reflexively identified as an "obot" or retread, you really should work on your writing, thinking and way of presenting your "self" and arguments here.
You probably can't help it, but you've got the "look" and you're consistent in it.
Some of the others from your team have gotten better at overcoming it. Maybe you can, too.