Man’s contribution to overall CO2 in the atmosphere is 3-4%.
Planting 12% more biomass would TOTALLY consume this miniscule amount of CO2.
But, the leftists want carbon taxes and some worldwide governing body to issue carbon credits, etc.
“The issue is never the issue. The issue is always the revolution” - Alinsky.
I’ve been wanting to set up a pyrolysis unit at my house. About 60-80% of the mass is converted into an oil that I could use to heat the house, most of the rest is left as charcoal that if turned back into the soil greatly increases the fertility of the soil.
A few acres would free me from propane and should make the garden more productive.
It would sequester carbon in the soil permanently, but that is not my purpose.
Theoretically, you could run a diesel engine off the stuff but it contains alot of acids and congeals if not stabilized.
Wind turbines do warm their local climates: they have a powerful heat island effect similar to a high rise city. Laboratory grade equipment is not needed to detect parts per million changes; a ordinary backyard thermometer can measure it. In the name of global warming, no man-made structure should be built higher than 40 feet. A side benefit is we’d have to demolish our communist high rise cities and their windmill eyesores they always erect in conservative areas.