To: Secret Agent Man
Actually, the article just refers to the child as “her 3-month-old fetus”.
It’s quite possible it wasn’t his to begin with.
24 posted on
03/18/2014 5:13:22 PM PDT by
digger48
To: digger48
"Actually, the article just refers to the child as “her 3-month-old fetus”.... It’s quite possible it wasn’t his to begin with." I think our culture has disintegrated to such an extent that all fetuses are considered, in principle, fatherless. Sex is scratching an itch, and actual begetting is a glitch --- not a feature.
32 posted on
03/19/2014 5:21:43 AM PDT by
Mrs. Don-o
(What does the LORD require of you, but to act justly, to love tenderly, to walk humbly with your God)
To: digger48
Well, male rats urinate around pregnant females heavily in order to cause an abortion if the young are not his.
This is just “proof of common ancestry”.
36 posted on
03/19/2014 5:27:54 AM PDT by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson