Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ButThreeLeftsDo

Old Carl has been around a long time.


2 posted on 03/11/2014 2:59:14 PM PDT by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: AppyPappy

Local gun range (indoor) has a full-auto event about 3 times a year. Once they had a WWII era KG in 9mm with 25 round sticks.

What a hoot!


6 posted on 03/11/2014 3:02:34 PM PDT by ButThreeLeftsDo (Support Free Republic!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: AppyPappy

9 posted on 03/11/2014 3:07:58 PM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: AppyPappy
What happened to the Light Anti-tank Weapon (LAW) or the thousands of recoilless rifles we had not that long ago? Or the .51 caliber Boys anti-tank rifle? BTW, we used to have a NUCLEAR armed recoilless rifle!
11 posted on 03/11/2014 3:11:16 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (I will raise $2M for Sarah Palin's next run, what will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: AppyPappy
The military is trying to work around the issue of the 2-300 meter effective range of the M4. Some would argue 200M max.

The 5.56 round is OK in a short-barreled carbine at short urban and jungle ranges.

But in the mountains and plains a much bigger and heavier round is called for.

7.62x51 is the minimum.

Different weapons, tactics and cartridges for different environments.

Or, just bring back the M-14 with no auto selection.

14 posted on 03/11/2014 3:17:54 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: AppyPappy

My first reaction was negative because our own anti-tank weapons have so much more range and power. But I suspect the anticipated primary use is against insurgents out of range of small arms or hard insurgent targets, not main battle tanks. Plus, I’m sure it’s a lot cheaper to fire.


16 posted on 03/11/2014 3:18:00 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: AppyPappy

Didn’t we, the before-Democrat-screwed USAR, have a 105mm recoilless rifle, already? I remember, it was Jeep-mounted; tripod mounted; modified to mount six of them armored vehicle.
Wha’ happen?


17 posted on 03/11/2014 3:19:09 PM PDT by Terry L Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: AppyPappy; Bender2

I always have loved Saabs


21 posted on 03/11/2014 3:23:04 PM PDT by big'ol_freeper ("Evil is powerless if the good are unafraid" ~ Ronald Wilson Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: AppyPappy

Saw these weapons in use watching an episode on the American Heroes Channel about the battle for Hue. Lots of recoilless rifle shots and an Ontos or two tooling around.


24 posted on 03/11/2014 3:30:24 PM PDT by NonValueAdded (Screw the farmers. I can get everything I need at the grocery store.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: AppyPappy
Its about time they let other units use the Gustav in combat. This RR was used effectively by the SF troops in the fight for Sperwan Ghar in 2006. The Gustav gave the US troops an advantage.
34 posted on 03/11/2014 4:57:01 PM PDT by vetvetdoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson