1 posted on
03/09/2014 9:27:59 AM PDT by
Signalman
To: Signalman
cold=low crop yeild.
warm+co2=good crop yeild.
(Generalization in effect!)
2 posted on
03/09/2014 9:41:00 AM PDT by
rktman
(Ethnicity: Redneck. Race: Daytona 500)
To: Signalman
Thank you
a New Chapter which should END the debate!
3 posted on
03/09/2014 9:41:02 AM PDT by
MeshugeMikey
(Jesus came to Save not Entertain / Ground John Kerry Now!)
To: Signalman
All Right! These guys are the A-Team!!!
To: Signalman
What is 1.2%? If it is Kelvin, that is 285 (avg. global temp. 12C or 54F) X .012 = 3.42 degrees Celsius or 6.156 F. to 15C or 60F
To: Signalman
former mermaid impersonator Darryl HannahLOL!!!
To: Signalman
Isn't NASA's primary mission these days "Muslim outreach?"
8 posted on
03/09/2014 9:52:59 AM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
(If Barack Hussein Obama entertains a thought that he does not verbalize, is it still a lie?)
To: Signalman
Doiron is similarly sceptical of the computer models used by climate alarmists. He and his team argue that the 105 models currently used by the IPCC are seriously flawed because they dont agree with each other and dont agree with empirical data. Such models are worse than useless; they are dangerous if used for decision making.
If computer models can not reach the same conclusion with regularity they can not be depended upon to as a means to make predictions of outcomes.
Ballistic computers are computer models used to decide how to launch rockets or canons shells.
if you have two ballistic models and one model that tells you your canon shell will land on London and another tells you that your shell will land on Paris how can you safely fire your canon?
Of course the answer is that you cant. If your models are so different that they disagree with each other by a large margin you must determine which is correct before you can make a decision.
9 posted on
03/09/2014 9:56:54 AM PDT by
Pontiac
(The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
To: Signalman
We got psychotic Muslims on the brink of getting their hands on nukes thanks to B. Hussein and Traitor Johnny and liberals are concerned whether or not Joe Q. Public is driving a Prius. Yes, a nuclear war is perfectly OK for the environment but not a freakin’ car.
To: Signalman
14 posted on
03/09/2014 10:56:54 AM PDT by
Jack Hydrazine
(Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
To: Signalman
These guys put men into space with a slide rule. The idiots today can’t function if the internet goes down. Who will you believe? The ones who put their theories to the test or the ones who put their theories so far into time they won’t have to live with criticism.
15 posted on
03/09/2014 11:04:48 AM PDT by
DeWalt
(Times are more like they used to be than they are today.)
To: Signalman
So say The Right Climate Stuff Research Team, a group of retired NASA Apollo scientists and engineers the men who put Neil Armstrong on the moon in a new report. Its an embarrassment to those of us who put NASAs name on the map to have people like James Hansen popping off about global warming, says the projects leader Hal Doiron. Great find Signalman
25 posted on
04/28/2014 9:37:24 AM PDT by
GOPJ
(Democrats are waging war on the middle class...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson