Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Kevmo

1) Has anyone asked for a nanor device? I’m pretty sure they’ll kick one down for almost nothing and you could experiment to your heart’s content.

2) What was the name of the researcher who had the two spheres in a bath during a conference and one generated a regular amount of heat energy? He cut them both open after the conference and they both appeared hollow although I’m pretty sure the hot one had hydrogen in it. Also, what type of LENR was it using, P&F cell or Rossi type LENR???

3) I’m still trying to read the book Excess heat; it’s very interesting. The book’s copyright is 2002 so why has no decent theory come out yet?

4) Is MIT teaching anything on LENR at their campus? Someone said that they would believe LENR works if MIT is teaching it although I don’t know how they get around the fact that they originally went out of their way to say that nothing was there. Did they blow off LENR so they could get a head start on it?

5) Still not a peep out of BLP. I don’t know if that is good or bad. I expected them to have a controlled experiment that showed excess heat but they called it off. It could mean that the cells didn’t work and this could be something honest out of BLP although I doubt it based on their past press releases.

6) Are Rossi’s new investors that pumped in over $10 million dollars going to publish anything??? Has anyone asked to be part of the free energy from the 1MW plant yet; where are they on that offer?

7) What happened to Defkalion?

If this is real and can be harnessed, it will be the equivalent of our generation’s heavier than air flight or atom bomb. At least we got to see the Internet born. I’m sure the EPA has already generated thousands of pages of regulations if someone comes out with a working plant. If it’s not real, then it can be our generation’s Keely motor company.


140 posted on 03/11/2014 7:22:29 AM PDT by Lx (Do you like it? Do you like it, Scott? I call it, "Mr. & Mrs. Tenorman Chili.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Lx
1) Has anyone asked for a nanor device? I’m pretty sure they’ll kick one down for almost nothing and you could experiment to your heart’s content.

I'm pretty sure the MFMP are getting one.

2) What was the name of the researcher who had the two spheres in a bath during a conference and one generated a regular amount of heat energy? He cut them both open after the conference and they both appeared hollow although I’m pretty sure the hot one had hydrogen in it. Also, what type of LENR was it using, P&F cell or Rossi type LENR???

It was Cravens, a well known LENR researcher. It was deuterium, so it would have been a classic P&F type cell, to follow your designation.

3) I’m still trying to read the book Excess heat; it’s very interesting. The book’s copyright is 2002 so why has no decent theory come out yet?

There are a bunch of decent

theories.
There are a bunch of theories for High Temperature Superconductivity as well, and that field has had no shortage of funds thrown at it. It resemble LENR in several ways, starting with Condensed Matter physics. Also, there are a bunch of different theories about how gravity works, but none are generally accepted. There's a law of gravity, but no accepted theory of gravity.

4) Is MIT teaching anything on LENR at their campus? Someone said that they would believe LENR works if MIT is teaching it although I don’t know how they get around the fact that they originally went out of their way to say that nothing was there. Did they blow off LENR so they could get a head start on it?

Right here in this article: Peter Hagelstein and Mitchell Swartz’s 2014 Cold Fusion Independent Activities Period (IAP) Course at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in January. He notes that Cold Fusion is a career killer.

5) Still not a peep out of BLP. I don’t know if that is good or bad. I expected them to have a controlled experiment that showed excess heat but they called it off. It could mean that the cells didn’t work and this could be something honest out of BLP although I doubt it based on their past press releases.

It isn't good for LENR. BLP's reputation is worse than Rossi's, it would seem.

6) Are Rossi’s new investors that pumped in over $10 million dollars going to publish anything??? Has anyone asked to be part of the free energy from the 1MW plant yet; where are they on that offer?

There's supposed to be some independent study coming out in April, but Rossi will be late as usual. This is a business now, so they'll need to do what it takes to generate ROI.

7) What happened to Defkalion?

I haven't heard anything. They gave a demo last year, seeming to follow in Rossi's footsteps of not doing it right. My impression of Defkalion was that they basically stole Rossi's technology when they worked with him, and they know even less than he does about how it works.

If this is real and can be harnessed, it will be the equivalent of our generation’s heavier than air flight or atom bomb. At least we got to see the Internet born. I’m sure the EPA has already generated thousands of pages of regulations if someone comes out with a working plant. If it’s not real, then it can be our generation’s Keely motor company.

If LENR breaks out, it will have a similar level of impact that gunpowder did. If it's "not real" or "can't be harnessed" then it is the most baffling scientific development since High Temperature Superconductivity.

141 posted on 03/11/2014 8:03:51 AM PDT by Kevmo ("A person's a person, no matter how small" ~Horton Hears a Who)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson